Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 25, 2011·Rexall Place, Edmonton

St. Louis Blues 5, Edmonton Oilers 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 50% of the time.

EDM winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL291825522
EDM01309017039

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:07STLChris StewartGWGAssists: Patrik Berglund, Roman Polak · Wrist, 0.37 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:48STLPatrik BerglundPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Carlo Colaiacovo · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 4:19STLChris StewartPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–0
  4. P3 15:59STLRoman PolakAssists: Brad Boyes, Barret Jackman · Snap, 0.17 xG4–0
  5. P3 17:53STLMatt D'AgostiniAssists: Cam Janssen, Andy McDonald · Wrist, 0.26 xG5–0
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 15:48EDMAles Hemsky: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:07STLRoman Polak: Holding2 min
  3. P2 2:34EDMShawn Horcoff: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:45EDMJean-Francois Jacques: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 14:45STLB.J. Crombeen: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 17:37EDMJordan Eberle: High sticking double minor4 min
  7. P3 10:53EDMTheo Peckham: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 10:53EDMColin Fraser: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 10:53STLKevin Shattenkirk: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 12:48STLCarlo Colaiacovo: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 18:00STLCam Janssen: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 18:00EDMJason Strudwick: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← STL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gagner won the faceoff against Sobotka
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLEDM
22Shots on goal39
2.9Expected goals3.0
41Shot attempts71
21Faceoffs won36
5Power plays2
13Penalty minutes29
18Hits20
22Blocked shots12
14Giveaways15
10Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestWinchester – Janssen – D'Agostini3:50

    xG 0.56–0.25 (69%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  2. Oshie – Stewart – Berglund8:10

    xG 0.61–0.52 (54%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  3. Steen – Crombeen – Sobotka8:54

    xG 0.14–0.27 (35%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

  4. McDonald – Boyes – Backes10:59

    xG 0.44–0.85 (34%)attempts 4–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Pietrangelo10:14

    xG 0.81–0.58 (59%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  2. Jackman – Polak12:39

    xG 0.79–0.69 (53%)attempts 11–16goals 2–0

  3. Colaiacovo – Strachan13:13

    xG 0.06–0.79 (7%)attempts 3–19goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Gagner – Paajarvi8:10

    xG 0.53–0.03 (95%)attempts 12–1goals 0–0

  2. Horcoff – Hemsky – Penner9:45

    xG 0.71–0.25 (74%)attempts 19–7goals 0–0

  3. Cogliano – Eberle – Hall9:56

    xG 0.68–0.81 (46%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  4. Jacques – Fraser – Reddox5:44

    xG 0.22–0.35 (39%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGilbert – Smid12:52

    xG 1.65–0.27 (86%)attempts 27–4goals 0–0

  2. Strudwick – Foster8:51

    xG 0.28–0.31 (48%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Vandermeer – Peckham11:42

    xG 0.23–0.30 (43%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.0 xGSTL 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 4/100 · #1177 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 50% of the time.

EDM winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).