Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 1, 2011·Philips Arena, Atlanta

Montréal Canadiens 3, Atlanta Thrashers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 50% of the time.

ATL winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL1518110323
ATL09016116141

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:22MTLMax PaciorettyUnassisted · Slap, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:34MTLJames WisniewskiPPGWGAssists: Andrei Kostitsyn, David Desharnais · Snap, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P3 14:14ATLNik AntropovAssists: Anthony Stewart · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P3 19:14MTLBrian GiontaENAssists: Scott Gomez, Max Pacioretty · Backhand, 0.60 xG3–1
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:34MTLMax Pacioretty: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 4:54ATLMark Stuart: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 9:18MTLTomas Plekanec: Interference2 min
  4. P1 0:00ATLAnthony Stewart: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 1:59MTLAndrei Kostitsyn: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P2 6:18MTLCarey Price: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 11:12ATLToby Enstrom: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 11:42MTLAndrei Kostitsyn: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 17:44ATLRon Hainsey: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 18:00MTLTomas Plekanec: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 19:00ATLDustin Byfuglien: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 0:21MTLTomas Plekanec: Interference2 min
  13. P3 0:21ATLChris Thorburn: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ATL
47% to win53% to win
← MTL attackATL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Little won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLATL
23Shots on goal41
2.6Expected goals2.7
40Shot attempts69
35Faceoffs won18
5Power plays5
14Penalty minutes12
16Hits16
17Blocked shots12
7Giveaways8
8Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestHalpern – Cammalleri – Plekanec9:01

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

  2. Moen – Kostitsyn – Eller8:16

    xG 0.04–0.05 (47%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Pouliot – Desharnais – White6:45

    xG 0.12–0.41 (23%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Gomez – Gionta – Pacioretty11:14

    xG 0.20–0.83 (19%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Sopel – Mara10:01

    xG 0.33–0.39 (46%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

  2. Hamrlik – Wisniewski15:30

    xG 0.24–0.41 (37%)attempts 8–19goals 0–0

  3. Gill – Subban14:08

    xG 0.09–0.74 (11%)attempts 7–16goals 0–0

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Antropov – Schremp2:00

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Ladd – Wheeler – Little10:52

    xG 0.18–0.07 (73%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Dvorak – Schremp – Stapleton2:20

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Boulton – Thorburn – Maxwell3:05

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Bogosian12:22

    xG 0.83–0.34 (71%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  2. Enstrom – Byfuglien14:19

    xG 0.53–0.21 (71%)attempts 16–8goals 1–0

  3. Hainsey – Byfuglien2:08

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ATL 2.7 xGMTL 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ATLMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ATL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ATL is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 17/100 · #976 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.89 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50ATL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 50% of the time.

ATL winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (ATL − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).