Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 3, 2011·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ01111017228
EDM213113112438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:06EDMSam GagnerPPAssists: Magnus Paajarvi, Tom Gilbert · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:52EDMTaylor HallAssists: Shawn Horcoff, Jason Strudwick · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:14EDMJordan EberleGWGAssists: Shawn Horcoff, Taylor Hall · Backhand, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P2 1:34CBJJan HejdaAssists: Samuel Pahlsson, Derek Dorsett · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P3 15:38CBJScottie UpshallAssists: R.J. Umberger, Kris Russell · Snap, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:48EDMAndrew CoglianoENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.68 xG2–4
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 3:01EDMRichard Petiot: Interference2 min
  2. P1 5:45EDMJason Strudwick: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 5:45CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 6:47CBJEthan Moreau: Interference2 min
  5. P1 10:15EDMRichard Petiot: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  6. P1 11:06CBJDerek Dorsett: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  7. P2 4:27EDMJim Vandermeer: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 11:01EDMTaylor Hall: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 13:33CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 13:33EDMTaylor Hall: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 13:33EDMTaylor Hall: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 18:37CBJMatt Calvert: Holding2 min
  13. P3 2:17CBJGrant Clitsome: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 3:47EDMGilbert Brule: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 19:12CBJAntoine Vermette: Holding2 min
  16. P3 19:31EDMJordan Eberle: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cogliano won the faceoff against Pahlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJEDM
28Shots on goal38
3.0Expected goals3.9
73Shot attempts53
45Faceoffs won28
5Power plays5
20Penalty minutes22
18Hits18
13Blocked shots26
19Giveaways16
19Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestVermette – Nash – Voracek3:30

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. MacKenzie – Upshall – Voracek2:46

    xG 0.15–0.01 (96%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Pahlsson – Dorsett – Calvert2:10

    xG 0.14–0.01 (91%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  4. MacKenzie – Umberger – Calvert3:44

    xG 0.14–0.07 (67%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Methot10:38

    xG 0.30–0.23 (56%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  2. Hejda – Russell2:44

    xG 0.21–0.16 (57%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Clitsome – Russell10:10

    xG 0.10–0.36 (22%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Brule – Cogliano7:20

    xG 0.31–0.03 (92%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Jacques – Fraser – Reddox5:46

    xG 0.24–0.13 (65%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Horcoff – Eberle – Hall6:07

    xG 0.14–0.14 (51%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  4. Gagner – Omark – Paajarvi5:22

    xG 0.02–0.42 (5%)attempts 2–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGilbert – Smid12:09

    xG 1.12–0.26 (81%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. Vandermeer – Foster4:22

    xG 0.35–0.24 (60%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  3. Vandermeer – Gilbert3:29

    xG 0.11–0.03 (82%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.9 xGCBJ 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #433 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.02 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).