Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 8, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL0721508230
MIN1511139525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:04MINMartin HavlatAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:43COLKevin PorterAssists: Ryan Wilson, Paul Stastny · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:11COLPaul StastnyPPAssists: Milan Hejduk, Matt Duchene · Backhand, 0.35 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:46MINAndrew BrunettePPAssists: Pierre-Marc Bouchard, Jared Spurgeon · Deflected, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:55MINJohn MaddenGWGAssists: Matt Cullen, Chuck Kobasew · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P3 13:30MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Martin Havlat, Eric Nystrom · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:56MINKyle BrodziakENAssists: Greg Zanon, Niklas Backstrom · Wrist, 0.53 xG2–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 10:12MINMartin Havlat: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:15COLMatt Duchene: Holding2 min
  3. P1 14:05COLPaul Stastny: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 0:40COLPaul Stastny: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 7:49MINPierre-Marc Bouchard: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 15:55MINBrent Burns: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P2 17:22COLRyan Wilson: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  8. P3 5:35MINMartin Havlat: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 17:20COLPeter Budaj: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 18:11MINMartin Havlat: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 0:00COLCody McLeod: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 0:00COLCody McLeod: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Madden
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
30Shots on goal25
2.1Expected goals2.5
56Shot attempts49
28Faceoffs won30
5Power plays5
22Penalty minutes10
10Hits12
12Blocked shots14
5Giveaways6
1Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Porter – Stastny10:35

    xG 0.37–0.24 (60%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Winnik – McLeod – O'Reilly4:20

    xG 0.33–0.21 (62%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. McClement – Winnik – O'Reilly4:34

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  4. Koci – Dupuis – Yip2:48

    xG 0.01–0.04 (25%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Byrne – Hunwick5:17

    xG 0.29–0.04 (88%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. O'Byrne – Johnson2:49

    xG 0.16–0.02 (87%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Foote – Hunwick2:59

    xG 0.24–0.12 (68%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Madden – Kobasew10:47

    xG 0.51–0.27 (65%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Havlat – Bouchard – Brodziak7:38

    xG 0.59–0.40 (60%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

  3. Nystrom – Staubitz – Latendresse5:04

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Brunette – Miettinen – Peters8:41

    xG 0.19–0.34 (37%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Burns17:11

    xG 0.87–0.40 (68%)attempts 17–13goals 2–1

  2. Zanon – Zidlicky10:10

    xG 0.33–0.14 (70%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Zanon – Barker2:56

    xG 0.02–0.10 (20%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.5 xGCOL 2.1 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #451 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.71 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).