Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 9, 2011·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

St. Louis Blues 4, Columbus Blue Jackets 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 65% of the time.

CBJ winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
STL091112511426
CBJ011360500322

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:43CBJJakub VoracekAssists: Derick Brassard, Rick Nash · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:17CBJR.J. UmbergerPPAssists: Grant Clitsome, Antoine Vermette · Tip-in, 0.22 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:07CBJDerek MacKenzieAssists: Jared Boll, Ethan Moreau · Slap, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 13:02STLAlex PietrangeloAssists: Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 2:32STLIan ColeAssists: Adam Cracknell · Slap, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:23STLChris StewartAssists: David Backes, Ian Cole · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:54STLChris StewartGWGAssists: Carlo Colaiacovo, Kevin Shattenkirk · Backhand, 0.06 xG4–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 4:24CBJSamuel Pahlsson: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 2:55STLIan Cole: Delaying game2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:32STLNikita Nikitin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 18:57CBJMarc Methot: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 7:56STLBarret Jackman: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 12:49STLPatrik Berglund: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← STL attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pahlsson won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCBJ
26Shots on goal22
1.4Expected goals2.1
39Shot attempts49
18Faceoffs won28
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
25Hits33
16Blocked shots9
0Giveaways10
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Oshie – Hensick4:39

    xG 0.22–0.13 (63%)attempts 8–1goals 1–1

  2. Porter – Stewart – Berglund9:01

    xG 0.28–0.19 (59%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  3. McDonald – Backes – D'Agostini10:59

    xG 0.14–0.44 (24%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestColaiacovo – Nikitin7:22

    xG 0.18–0.05 (80%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Jackman – Nikitin4:24

    xG 0.03–0.01 (67%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Colaiacovo – Pietrangelo3:43

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestVermette – Umberger – Calvert9:46

    xG 0.61–0.11 (85%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Moreau – MacKenzie – Boll4:16

    xG 0.18–0.02 (92%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  3. Pahlsson – Upshall – Dorsett11:41

    xG 0.26–0.24 (52%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  4. Nash – Brassard – Voracek10:57

    xG 0.43–0.57 (43%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRivet – Tyutin13:56

    xG 1.02–0.13 (88%)attempts 19–6goals 1–2

  2. Hejda – Methot17:43

    xG 0.33–0.43 (44%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

  3. Clitsome – Russell13:19

    xG 0.23–0.45 (34%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.1 xGSTL 1.4 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #143 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.77 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 65% of the time.

CBJ winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).