Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 10, 2011·TD Garden, Boston

Buffalo Sabres 4, Boston Bruins 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF0112221814445
BOS115171700329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:54BOSNathan HortonAssists: Milan Lucic, David Krejci · Tip-in, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:26BOSMark RecchiAssists: Michael Ryder, Zdeno Chara · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P2 11:53BUFTyler EnnisAssists: Steve Montador, Drew Stafford · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:52BUFThomas VanekPPAssists: Tyler Ennis, Tyler Myers · Tip-in, 0.25 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:18BOSGregory CampbellAssists: Zdeno Chara, Shawn Thornton · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:05BUFTim ConnollyPPAssists: Thomas Vanek, Brad Boyes · Wrist, 0.34 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:44BUFBrad BoyesGWGAssists: Nathan Gerbe · Tip-in, 0.28 xG4–3
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 2:54BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:54BOSGregory Campbell: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:31BOSShawn Thornton: Interference2 min
  4. P1 6:36BUFTyler Myers: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 5:43BUFMike Grier: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 5:43BOSAdam McQuaid: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 6:54BOSZdeno Chara: Boarding2 min
  8. P2 7:13BOSDennis Seidenberg: Cross checking2 min
  9. P2 9:17BUFThomas Vanek: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P2 14:11BOSJohnny Boychuk: Hooking2 min
  11. P2 17:08BOSTomas Kaberle: Tripping2 min · PPG
  12. P2 19:11BUFPaul Gaustad: Fighting5 min
  13. P2 19:11BOSAdam McQuaid: Fighting5 min
  14. P2 19:51BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  15. P2 19:51BOSMilan Lucic: Fighting5 min
  16. P2 19:51BUFChris Butler: Roughing2 min
  17. P3 3:25BOSMark Recchi: High sticking2 min · PPG
  18. P3 3:42BOSBrad Marchand: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00McCormick won the faceoff against Campbell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFBOS
45Shots on goal29
4.1Expected goals2.5
65Shot attempts56
34Faceoffs won32
7Power plays3
23Penalty minutes31
23Hits24
18Blocked shots13
7Giveaways4
8Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – McCormick – Vanek4:33

    xG 0.19–0.05 (79%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Niedermayer – Grier – Gaustad2:21

    xG 0.12–0.01 (93%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Boyes – Stafford – Ennis8:09

    xG 0.44–0.35 (56%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  4. Niedermayer – Grier – McCormick2:59

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Morrisonn10:42

    xG 0.49–0.27 (65%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Butler – Myers13:49

    xG 0.67–0.51 (57%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

  3. Montador – Sekera14:23

    xG 0.58–0.68 (46%)attempts 9–16goals 1–1

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestRecchi – Ryder – Kelly8:59

    xG 0.76–0.38 (67%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Horton – Krejci – Lucic11:48

    xG 0.37–0.40 (48%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Thornton – Campbell – Paille4:35

    xG 0.00–0.27 (0%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Bergeron – Peverley – Marchand10:34

    xG 0.29–0.58 (33%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKaberle – McQuaid7:20

    xG 0.37–0.12 (76%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  2. Seidenberg – McQuaid4:14

    xG 0.22–0.09 (71%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  3. Chara – Seidenberg2:11

    xG 0.02–0.01 (72%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 2.5 xGBUF 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #142 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.16 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).