Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 20, 2011·Honda Center, Anaheim

Calgary Flames 4, Anaheim Ducks 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 63% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CGY11221311402441
ANA390911114533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:18ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Corey Perry · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:36ANACorey PerryPPAssists: Teemu Selanne, Ryan Getzlaf · Tip-in, 0.52 xG0–2
  3. P1 5:49ANAFrancois BeaucheminAssists: Saku Koivu, Teemu Selanne · Slap, 0.02 xG0–3
  4. P1 18:52CGYTom KostopoulosAssists: Matt Stajan, Tim Jackman · Slap, 0.16 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:04CGYRene BourqueAssists: Curtis Glencross, Tom Kostopoulos · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 16:44CGYTom KostopoulosAssists: Steve Staios, Curtis Glencross · Deflected, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:10CGYJarome IginlaPPAssists: Alex Tanguay, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 17:59ANATeemu SelannePPAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Lubomir Visnovsky · Deflected, 0.11 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:38ANACorey PerryGWGAssists: Toni Lydman, Ryan Getzlaf · Deflected, 0.11 xG4–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 2:44CGYRobyn Regehr: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:43ANABrandon McMillan: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 16:23ANACorey Perry: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 12:08ANAJason Blake: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 5:45ANACam Fowler: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 12:12CGYMatt Stajan: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 16:58CGYRene Bourque: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. OT 2:34CGYSteve Staios: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← CGY attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jokinen won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYANA
41Shots on goal33
2.9Expected goals3.6
76Shot attempts51
41Faceoffs won38
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
23Hits22
7Blocked shots20
13Giveaways12
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestKostopoulos – Glencross – Bourque5:40

    xG 0.44–0.14 (75%)attempts 7–3goals 2–0

  2. Kotalik – Hagman – Stajan8:31

    xG 0.39–0.10 (79%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – Jokinen – Tanguay8:47

    xG 0.38–0.28 (58%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  4. Iginla – Tanguay – Backlund2:10

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSarich – Regehr2:04

    xG 0.72–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  2. Staios – Babchuk7:50

    xG 0.51–0.38 (57%)attempts 13–5goals 2–0

  3. Regehr – Bouwmeester17:22

    xG 0.53–0.44 (54%)attempts 20–11goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarchant – Ruutu – Parros5:35

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Winchester – McMillan – Sexton7:07

    xG 0.38–0.17 (69%)attempts 3–13goals 0–0

  3. Selanne – Koivu – Ryan2:21

    xG 0.02–0.23 (7%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Ryan14:38

    xG 0.38–0.60 (39%)attempts 10–20goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrookbank – Fowler10:53

    xG 0.36–0.21 (63%)attempts 5–13goals 0–0

  2. Lydman – Beauchemin2:00

    xG 0.06–0.01 (91%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Fowler3:08

    xG 0.08–0.20 (29%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.6 xGCGY 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #15 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.46 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 63% of the time.

ANA winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).