Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 22, 2011·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Washington Capitals 5, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 69% of the time.

PHI winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
WSH271715043523
PHI010211211012433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:52WSHNicklas BackstromAssists: Brooks Laich · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:46WSHMike KnubleAssists: Jason Chimera, Marcus Johansson · Deflected, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 1:22WSHDennis WidemanPPAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, Mike Knuble · Slap, 0.02 xG3–0
  4. P2 8:05PHIKris VersteegAssists: Matt Carle, Andrej Meszaros · Snap, 0.24 xG3–1
  5. P2 19:26PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Andreas Nodl, Braydon Coburn · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 9:58PHIAndreas NodlAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. P3 14:15PHIDaniel BrièreAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Ville Leino · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P3 16:41WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: Mike Knuble, Scott Hannan · Slap, 0.06 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Ville Leino scored
  2. 2. WSH Matt Hendricks scored
  3. 3. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  4. 4. WSH Nicklas Backstrom scored
  5. 5. PHI Daniel Brière scored
  6. 6. WSH Alexander Semin scored
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 8:26PHIScott Hartnell: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 9:40WSHAlexander Semin: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P1 19:24PHIDaniel Carcillo: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 3:54WSHJay Beagle: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← WSH attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Brière won the faceoff against Gordon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHPHI
23Shots on goal33
2.4Expected goals3.6
51Shot attempts70
24Faceoffs won31
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
17Hits29
21Blocked shots14
7Giveaways9
8Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestKnuble – Chimera – Johansson11:55

    xG 0.70–0.41 (63%)attempts 15–10goals 2–0

  2. Hendricks – Fehr – Beagle6:00

    xG 0.31–0.34 (48%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  3. Sturm – Bradley – Gordon9:27

    xG 0.26–0.50 (35%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

  4. Laich – Semin – Backstrom12:28

    xG 0.20–0.95 (18%)attempts 10–21goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Erskine13:22

    xG 0.68–0.34 (67%)attempts 9–16goals 1–0

  2. Hannan – Wideman3:39

    xG 0.06–0.15 (27%)attempts 2–5goals 1–2

  3. Wideman – Schultz12:56

    xG 0.54–1.15 (32%)attempts 13–17goals 1–2

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Giroux – Nodl14:04

    xG 1.06–0.54 (66%)attempts 25–8goals 2–0

  2. Betts – Carcillo – Powe5:03

    xG 0.09–0.05 (66%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

  3. Brière – Hartnell – Leino12:52

    xG 0.50–0.49 (50%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

  4. Richards – Versteeg – van Riemsdyk12:18

    xG 0.31–0.31 (50%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Coburn15:19

    xG 1.25–0.47 (73%)attempts 19–8goals 1–2

  2. Timonen – Meszaros3:09

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. O'Donnell – Boynton3:49

    xG 0.25–0.14 (64%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.6 xGWSH 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #19 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.50 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 69% of the time.

PHI winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).