Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 22, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Toronto Maple Leafs 3, Minnesota Wild 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 74% of the time.

MIN winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR181316317
MIN07011011029

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:39TORJoffrey LupulGWGAssists: Tyler Bozak, Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 11:20TORMikhail GrabovskiAssists: Clarke MacArthur, Nikolay Kulemin · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P3 2:13TORCarl GunnarssonPPAssists: Mikhail Grabovski, Nikolay Kulemin · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–0
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 4:01MINEric Nystrom: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 12:21MINMatt Cullen: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 13:06TORTim Brent: Interference2 min
  4. P1 18:20MINPierre-Marc Bouchard: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 1:12TORCarl Gunnarsson: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 2:07MINAndrew Brunette: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 4:04MINClayton Stoner: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 7:04TORLuke Schenn: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 13:18TORNazem Kadri: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 1:35MINMikko Koivu: High sticking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 7:06TORKeith Aulie: Interference2 min
  12. P3 15:39MINGreg Zanon: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 15:39TORMikhail Grabovski: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 17:14TORKeith Aulie: High sticking2 min
  15. P3 19:21TORMatt Lashoff: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← TOR attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Madden won the faceoff against Grabovski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORMIN
17Shots on goal29
1.3Expected goals2.6
38Shot attempts58
35Faceoffs won31
6Power plays7
16Penalty minutes14
18Hits18
17Blocked shots13
2Giveaways11
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestLupul – Kessel – Bozak8:29

    xG 0.35–0.10 (78%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. Brent – Rosehill – Brown3:40

    xG 0.17–0.02 (90%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. MacArthur – Grabovski – Kulemin9:47

    xG 0.18–0.21 (47%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  4. Sjostrom – Crabb – Kadri5:53

    xG 0.04–0.19 (18%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLashoff – Schenn3:29

    xG 0.21–0.05 (80%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Aulie – Schenn2:24

    xG 0.11–0.00 (99%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  3. Lebda – Gunnarsson5:50

    xG 0.17–0.09 (66%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Miettinen – Koivu8:11

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

  2. Havlat – Bouchard – Brodziak5:30

    xG 0.22–0.13 (63%)attempts 5–3goals 0–2

  3. Cullen – Madden – Clutterbuck5:44

    xG 0.21–0.17 (55%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Madden – Kobasew – Nystrom4:12

    xG 0.02–0.03 (41%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Prosser12:11

    xG 0.33–0.15 (68%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Burns10:47

    xG 0.27–0.18 (61%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

  3. Stoner – Spurgeon11:24

    xG 0.29–0.35 (45%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.6 xGTOR 1.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 8/100 · #1096 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 74% of the time.

MIN winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).