Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 29, 2011·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 56% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI1621028524
PIT1716014227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:22PITAlex KovalevAssists: Kris Letang, Mark Letestu · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:56PHIJeff CarterAssists: Braydon Coburn, Matt Carle · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:21PITTyler KennedyAssists: Brooks Orpik, Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:45PHIScott HartnellPPAssists: Ville Leino, Kimmo Timonen · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:32PHIClaude GirouxGWGAssists: Sean O'Donnell, Andrej Meszaros · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:30PHIVille LeinoAssists: Scott Hartnell, Daniel Brière · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 8:38PHIVille LeinoAssists: Daniel Brière, Sean O'Donnell · Wrist, 0.25 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 1:51PITChris Conner: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 3:34PHIMike Richards: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 13:56PITMatt Niskanen: Holding2 min
  4. P2 13:03PITPaul Martin: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P3 8:59PHIMatt Carle: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 13:23PHIScott Hartnell: Interference2 min
  7. P3 16:08PITBen Lovejoy: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 19:18PHIDaniel Carcillo: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
24Shots on goal27
2.2Expected goals2.0
40Shot attempts54
21Faceoffs won31
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
27Hits29
14Blocked shots13
3Giveaways5
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestRichards – Versteeg – van Riemsdyk8:19

    xG 0.33–0.13 (72%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  2. Carter – Giroux – Nodl10:40

    xG 0.13–0.20 (39%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

  3. Betts – Carcillo – Powe6:31

    xG 0.05–0.24 (16%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Brière – Hartnell – Leino11:38

    xG 0.44–0.67 (39%)attempts 6–13goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Donnell – Meszaros8:26

    xG 0.41–0.20 (68%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  2. Boynton – Carle5:37

    xG 0.22–0.13 (63%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. O'Donnell – Coburn5:24

    xG 0.06–0.10 (37%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Talbot – Conner8:45

    xG 0.64–0.09 (88%)attempts 11–2goals 0–1

  2. Kovalev – Neal – Letestu10:07

    xG 0.38–0.01 (96%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Asham – Adams – Rupp8:19

    xG 0.05–0.06 (44%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Kunitz – Kennedy – Staal12:14

    xG 0.13–0.37 (26%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Letang12:46

    xG 0.64–0.12 (84%)attempts 16–5goals 2–0

  2. Niskanen – Lovejoy9:18

    xG 0.41–0.09 (82%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  3. Orpik – Lovejoy2:04

    xG 0.04–0.20 (15%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.0 xGPHI 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 56/100 · #517 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.44 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 56% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).