Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 31, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Edmonton Oilers 2, Minnesota Wild 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM09113113235
MIN2921003422

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:24MINAntti MiettinenPPAssists: Matt Cullen, Andrew Brunette · Tip-in, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:59MINMarek ZidlickyAssists: Pierre-Marc Bouchard, Kyle Brodziak · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:24MINBrad StaubitzGWGAssists: Eric Nystrom, John Madden · Snap, 0.18 xG0–3
  4. P2 13:13MINMartin HavlatAssists: Chuck Kobasew, Brent Burns · Slap, 0.03 xG0–4
  5. P2 19:19EDMTom GilbertPPAssists: Ryan Jones, Magnus Paajarvi · Slap, 0.04 xG1–4
  6. P3 14:44EDMLinus OmarkPPAssists: Tom Gilbert, Jim Vandermeer · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 6:50EDMTheo Peckham: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:22EDMJordan Eberle: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 11:45MINAntti Miettinen: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P2 7:52MINPierre-Marc Bouchard: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 7:52EDMTheo Peckham: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 9:05EDMJim Vandermeer: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 16:05EDMChris VandeVelde: Holding2 min
  8. P2 17:47MINAntti Miettinen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 11:10MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 12:42MINKyle Brodziak: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 14:17MINBrent Burns: Slashing2 min · PPG
  12. P3 15:11EDMLadislav Smid: Interference2 min
  13. P3 19:40EDMGilbert Brule: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against VandeVelde
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMMIN
35Shots on goal22
2.4Expected goals2.7
59Shot attempts38
27Faceoffs won34
6Power plays6
14Penalty minutes14
16Hits12
7Blocked shots15
4Giveaways4
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestReddox – Brule – Eberle8:52

    xG 0.56–0.18 (76%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  2. Jones – VandeVelde – Paajarvi8:07

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Jacques – MacIntyre – O'Marra4:35

    xG 0.01–0.16 (7%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Cogliano – Omark – Hartikainen10:01

    xG 0.15–0.35 (30%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVandermeer – Petry14:18

    xG 0.52–0.35 (59%)attempts 20–7goals 0–2

  2. Strudwick – Peckham10:58

    xG 0.28–0.25 (53%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Gilbert – Smid11:19

    xG 0.24–0.23 (51%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBouchard – Brodziak – Clutterbuck7:50

    xG 0.43–0.11 (80%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  2. Madden – Nystrom – Staubitz7:44

    xG 0.29–0.11 (72%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Brunette – Miettinen – Koivu9:05

    xG 0.02–0.35 (6%)attempts 1–10goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Havlat – Kobasew7:49

    xG 0.03–0.48 (6%)attempts 3–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Schultz – Burns11:55

    xG 0.54–0.51 (52%)attempts 11–17goals 2–0

  2. Zanon – Zidlicky15:18

    xG 0.10–0.15 (40%)attempts 4–12goals 1–0

  3. Stoner – Spurgeon9:54

    xG 0.20–0.45 (31%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.7 xGEDM 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #468 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).