Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 2, 2011·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Detroit Red Wings 4, Nashville Predators 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
DET01521211212441
NSH11121001201334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:00NSHRyan SuterPPAssists: Mike Fisher, Patric Hornqvist · Slap, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:42NSHMartin EratPPAssists: Shea Weber, Ryan Suter · Tip-in, 0.21 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:37NSHSergei KostitsynAssists: Mike Fisher, Matt Halischuk · Slap, 0.25 xG0–3
  4. P2 3:28DETJakub KindlUnassisted · Snap, 0.02 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:49DETJustin AbdelkaderAssists: Brad Stuart, Tomas Holmstrom · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:59DETJustin AbdelkaderAssists: Todd Bertuzzi, Brian Rafalski · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:58DETDaniel ClearyGWGAssists: Brian Rafalski, Henrik Zetterberg · Tip-in, 0.20 xG4–3
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 4:34DETTodd Bertuzzi: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 4:34NSHShane O'Brien: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:17NSHRyan Suter: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 11:31NSHShane O'Brien: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 11:31DETTomas Holmstrom: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P1 13:46DETJakub Kindl: Interference2 min
  7. P1 14:18NSHShea Weber: Cross checking2 min
  8. P1 16:16DETTomas Holmstrom: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. P1 18:07DETJustin Abdelkader: Boarding2 min · PPG
  10. P1 18:34DETTomas Holmstrom: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P2 0:16DETBrad Stuart: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  12. P2 2:43DETTodd Bertuzzi: Fighting5 min
  13. P2 2:43NSHShane O'Brien: Fighting5 min
  14. P2 9:49DETKris Draper: Slashing2 min
  15. P2 11:02NSHMartin Erat: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  16. P3 13:19DETRuslan Salei: Cross checking2 min
  17. P3 16:08DETRuslan Salei: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← DET attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zetterberg won the faceoff against Fisher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETNSH
41Shots on goal34
2.2Expected goals3.5
58Shot attempts56
30Faceoffs won31
3Power plays8
28Penalty minutes18
29Hits23
14Blocked shots9
8Giveaways11
11Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestDraper – Eaves – Helm6:46

    xG 0.46–0.12 (80%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. Bertuzzi – Franzen – Abdelkader5:06

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  3. Holmstrom – Filppula – Franzen2:35

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Cleary – Zetterberg – Hudler9:33

    xG 0.22–0.22 (50%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalei – Kindl8:32

    xG 0.37–0.17 (68%)attempts 17–5goals 1–0

  2. Rafalski – Ericsson14:53

    xG 0.42–0.26 (62%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  3. Lidstrom – Stuart13:13

    xG 0.58–0.43 (58%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Erat – Ward9:59

    xG 0.57–0.15 (79%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Dumont – Geoffrion – Wilson3:20

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–1

  3. Smithson – Halischuk – Spaling7:16

    xG 0.11–0.39 (22%)attempts 4–9goals 0–2

  4. Fisher – Kostitsyn – Hornqvist9:31

    xG 0.02–0.34 (6%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Franson9:11

    xG 0.35–0.21 (63%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  2. Klein – Blum10:56

    xG 0.42–0.39 (52%)attempts 7–10goals 1–1

  3. Suter – Weber14:27

    xG 0.40–0.44 (48%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.5 xGDET 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #114 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.89 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).