Sat, Apr 2, 2011·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles
Dallas Stars 1, Los Angeles Kings 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 012 | 15 | 08 | 125 |
| LAK | 012 | 110 | 210 | 332 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 4:15LAKWayne SimmondsAssists: Willie Mitchell, Trevor Lewis · Deflected, 0.05 xG0–1
- P2 5:28DALBrad RichardsAssists: Jamie Benn, Alex Goligoski · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
- P3 12:50LAKMatt GreeneGWGAssists: Wayne Simmonds, Kyle Clifford · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
- P3 19:52LAKDustin BrownENAssists: Jarret Stoll · Wrist, 0.69 xG1–3
Penalties (2)
- P2 19:51LAKBrad Richardson: Roughing2 min
- P2 19:51DALMike Ribeiro: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Richards won the faceoff against Handzus
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Dallas Stars
Forward lines
- bestLangenbrunner – Petersen – Wandell7:39
xG 0.47–0.15 (76%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0
- Langenbrunner – Ott – Wandell3:05
xG 0.02–0.04 (36%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1
- Morrow – Ribeiro – Segal13:48
xG 0.33–0.47 (41%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0
- Richards – Eriksson – Benn16:30
xG 0.35–0.73 (32%)attempts 14–18goals 1–1
Defence pairs
- Skrastins – Fistric10:29
xG 0.30–0.49 (38%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1
- Robidas – Goligoski20:53
xG 0.47–1.01 (32%)attempts 18–17goals 0–0
- Woywitka – Daley19:09
xG 0.59–1.41 (29%)attempts 16–26goals 0–0
Los Angeles Kings
Forward lines
- bestHandzus – Brown – Penner14:42
xG 1.32–0.32 (80%)attempts 22–10goals 0–0
- Richardson – Simmonds – Clifford9:27
xG 0.91–0.33 (74%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0
- Smyth – Stoll – Moller14:16
xG 0.09–0.18 (34%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1
- Ponikarovsky – Lewis – Westgarth5:05
xG 0.00–0.35 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGreene – Martinez13:39
xG 1.39–0.23 (86%)attempts 19–8goals 1–0
- Scuderi – Doughty19:22
xG 0.83–0.47 (64%)attempts 19–16goals 0–1
- Mitchell – Doughty2:16
xG 0.08–0.02 (82%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (LAK − DAL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).