Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Apr 8, 2011·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Minnesota Wild 3, Edmonton Oilers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1716114327
EDM0811506129

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:30MINBrent BurnsPPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Snap, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:25MINJared SpurgeonGWGAssists: Pierre-Marc Bouchard, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:52EDMTeemu HartikainenAssists: Jordan Eberle, Chris VandeVelde · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–1
  4. P3 19:11MINAndrew BrunetteENAssists: Pierre-Marc Bouchard, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.69 xG3–1
Penalties (23)
  1. P1 0:07MINClayton Stoner: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 0:07EDMTheo Peckham: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 0:07MINClayton Stoner: Game misconduct10 min
  4. P1 2:31MINBrad Staubitz: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 2:31EDMJean-Francois Jacques: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 3:55MINPierre-Marc Bouchard: Tripping2 min
  7. P1 8:17EDMSteve MacIntyre: Instigator2 min
  8. P1 8:17EDMSteve MacIntyre: Fighting5 min
  9. P1 8:17EDMSteve MacIntyre: Game misconduct10 min
  10. P1 9:36MINCal Clutterbuck: Misconduct10 min
  11. P1 9:36EDMTheo Peckham: Misconduct10 min
  12. P1 9:36MINCal Clutterbuck: Boarding5 min
  13. P1 9:36MINKyle Brodziak: Misconduct10 min
  14. P1 9:36EDMLiam Reddox: Misconduct10 min
  15. P1 9:36EDMLiam Reddox: Roughing2 min
  16. P1 13:55EDMChris VandeVelde: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  17. P2 10:07MINBrad Staubitz: Holding2 min
  18. P2 19:25EDMChris VandeVelde: Holding2 min
  19. P3 13:46MINMikko Koivu: Slashing2 min
  20. P3 13:46EDMTheo Peckham: Misconduct10 min
  21. P3 15:18EDMTeemu Hartikainen: Roughing2 min
  22. P3 15:18MINDrew Bagnall: Roughing2 min
  23. P3 16:02EDMLinus Omark: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Brodziak won the faceoff against VandeVelde
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINEDM
27Shots on goal29
3.3Expected goals2.6
50Shot attempts63
25Faceoffs won20
7Power plays3
53Penalty minutes69
19Hits21
19Blocked shots12
18Giveaways9
11Takeaways21

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Miettinen – Clutterbuck4:39

    xG 0.38–0.04 (91%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Kobasew – McMillan – Gillies2:27

    xG 0.16–0.06 (74%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Brunette – Koivu – Bouchard7:06

    xG 0.38–0.32 (54%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

  4. Nystrom – Brodziak – Staubitz3:39

    xG 0.04–0.03 (56%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Burns8:11

    xG 0.51–0.16 (77%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Zanon – Noreau3:03

    xG 0.17–0.03 (84%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Zanon – Spurgeon6:18

    xG 0.21–0.10 (68%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestJones – Reddox – O'Marra6:32

    xG 0.22–0.12 (65%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. VandeVelde – Omark – Paajarvi2:01

    xG 0.05–0.07 (44%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. VandeVelde – Eberle – Hartikainen10:22

    xG 0.46–0.56 (45%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  4. Cogliano – Omark – Paajarvi10:05

    xG 0.25–0.40 (39%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Strudwick – Vandermeer2:02

    xG 0.10–0.06 (61%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Vandermeer – Smid2:10

    xG 0.09–0.07 (58%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Strudwick – Foster2:05

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.6 xGMIN 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 20/100 · #930 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.05 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 63% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).