Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 9, 2011·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 3, Calgary Flames 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
VAN0130721712339
CGY0112190600236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:39CGYJarome IginlaPPAssists: Alex Tanguay, Mark Giordano · Snap, 0.26 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:27CGYMikael BacklundPPAssists: Mark Giordano · Slap, 0.22 xG0–2
  3. P3 2:02VANAlexandre BurrowsAssists: Daniel Sedin · Slap, 0.47 xG1–2
  4. P3 11:05VANRyan KeslerPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Daniel Sedin · Snap, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. OT 2:41VANChristian EhrhoffGWGAssists: Alexander Edler, Jannik Hansen · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 0:26VANDan Hamhuis: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 3:59CGYBrendan Mikkelson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 4:31VANHenrik Sedin: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 10:32CGYJarome Iginla: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 14:20VANTanner Glass: Interference2 min
  6. P2 0:44VANChris Higgins: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 2:01VANRyan Kesler: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 10:50VANRyan Kesler: Slashing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 3:58VANChris Higgins: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 7:03CGYRobyn Regehr: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 7:03VANMikael Samuelsson: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 7:03CGYJarome Iginla: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 7:03VANAlexandre Burrows: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  14. P3 9:14VANMaxim Lapierre: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 9:14CGYMatt Stajan: Roughing2 min · PPG
  16. P3 9:14CGYMatt Stajan: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Backlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
39Shots on goal36
2.9Expected goals2.6
78Shot attempts57
27Faceoffs won33
3Power plays7
20Penalty minutes12
11Hits15
11Blocked shots21
7Giveaways17
10Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows5:52

    xG 0.71–0.15 (83%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Samuelsson – Sedin – Sedin3:47

    xG 0.08–0.18 (30%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Glass – Hansen – Raymond6:36

    xG 0.11–0.25 (29%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Samuelsson – Higgins – Kesler9:31

    xG 0.21–0.51 (29%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Edler10:52

    xG 0.88–0.27 (77%)attempts 19–11goals 1–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Ballard2:47

    xG 0.07–0.02 (79%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Salo – Ballard4:22

    xG 0.09–0.15 (37%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Tanguay – Backlund12:00

    xG 0.47–0.22 (68%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Langkow – Kostopoulos – Glencross7:31

    xG 0.19–0.15 (57%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Jokinen – Jackman – Bourque8:34

    xG 0.35–0.80 (30%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Carson10:27

    xG 0.51–0.09 (86%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Sarich – Babchuk5:33

    xG 0.20–0.14 (59%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Regehr – Bouwmeester10:56

    xG 0.30–0.33 (47%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.6 xGVAN 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #309 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.73 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).