Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 10, 2011·Philips Arena, Atlanta

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Atlanta Thrashers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Atlanta Thrashers win this game 74% of the time.

ATL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT094813520
ATL112011116239

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:07ATLAndrew LaddPPAssists: Bryan Little, Nik Antropov · Snap, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:25PITTyler KennedyPPAssists: Matt Niskanen, Ben Lovejoy · Snap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:53PITPascal DupuisAssists: Max Talbot, Chris Conner · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:27PITMike RuppGWGAssists: Eric Godard, Ben Lovejoy · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 18:14PITMark LetestuAssists: Eric Tangradi, Alex Kovalev · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–1
  6. P3 13:15ATLTim StapletonPPAssists: Nik Antropov, Ron Hainsey · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:32PITMike ComrieENAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.65 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:28PITEric Godard: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 3:39PITMax Talbot: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 12:53ATLAndrey Zubarev: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 4:52ATLBlake Wheeler: Boarding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 18:37ATLJohnny Oduya: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 6:39PITMatt Niskanen: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 12:14PITEric Tangradi: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 13:59PITArron Asham: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ATL
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackATL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Talbot won the faceoff against Antropov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITATL
20Shots on goal39
1.6Expected goals2.9
41Shot attempts71
29Faceoffs won29
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes6
12Hits12
15Blocked shots13
1Giveaways5
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAdams – Rupp – Godard2:06

    xG 0.15–0.02 (86%)attempts 3–5goals 1–0

  2. Rupp – Comrie – Kennedy4:37

    xG 0.18–0.21 (45%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Asham – Adams – Godard5:12

    xG 0.05–0.13 (26%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Dupuis – Talbot – Conner10:36

    xG 0.20–0.33 (38%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMichalek – Lovejoy8:53

    xG 0.32–0.24 (58%)attempts 7–11goals 2–0

  2. Orpik – Letang10:16

    xG 0.20–0.19 (51%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  3. Engelland – Lovejoy2:14

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. bestStewart – Kane – Burmistrov2:51

    xG 0.53–0.06 (89%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Ladd – Wheeler – Little9:09

    xG 0.48–0.22 (69%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  3. Stapleton – Maxwell – Burmistrov3:55

    xG 0.19–0.06 (77%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

  4. Antropov – Thorburn – Klingberg2:16

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Bogosian3:30

    xG 0.52–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Hainsey – Byfuglien10:59

    xG 0.57–0.24 (71%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  3. Byfuglien – Zubarev6:13

    xG 0.39–0.06 (87%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ATL 2.9 xGPIT 1.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ATLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ATL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ATL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #556 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.04 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50ATL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Atlanta Thrashers win this game 74% of the time.

ATL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (ATL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).