Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 12, 2011·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Vancouver Canucks 4, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN19214117440
PHI3141617527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:14PHIClaude GirouxPPAssists: Chris Pronger, Matt Read · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:12PHIChris ProngerPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Jaromir Jagr · Slap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:35VANMikael SamuelssonPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Daniel Sedin · Deflected, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:48PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.31 xG1–3
  5. P2 6:41VANHenrik SedinAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Alexander Edler · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P2 8:32PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Sean Couturier, Kimmo Timonen · Snap, 0.23 xG2–4
  7. P2 15:31VANChris HigginsAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–4
  8. P3 3:39VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Mikael Samuelsson · Snap, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. P3 4:40PHIAndrej MeszarosGWGAssists: Daniel Brière · Snap, 0.05 xG4–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:39VANSami Salo: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 5:50VANMikael Samuelsson: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 7:57VANHenrik Sedin: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 10:53VANAlexandre Burrows: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 15:33PHIScott Hartnell: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P1 0:00PHIScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 11:21VANAaron Volpatti: Holding2 min
  8. P3 2:25PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  9. P3 5:10PHIZac Rinaldo: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 10:17PHIJaromir Jagr: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 14:26PHIJakub Voracek: Boarding2 min
  12. P3 16:30PHIChris Pronger: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Brière won the faceoff against Malhotra
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANPHI
40Shots on goal27
3.4Expected goals3.2
79Shot attempts43
34Faceoffs won37
7Power plays5
10Penalty minutes14
14Hits18
9Blocked shots27
5Giveaways12
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows9:47

    xG 0.39–0.16 (71%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  2. Lapierre – Weise – Volpatti4:09

    xG 0.12–0.04 (77%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Higgins – Hansen – Hodgson3:07

    xG 0.07–0.25 (22%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Sturm – Samuelsson – Hodgson3:21

    xG 0.05–0.48 (10%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa13:40

    xG 0.69–0.53 (57%)attempts 18–10goals 1–1

  2. Salo – Edler8:40

    xG 0.20–0.16 (55%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  3. Bieksa – Ballard2:04

    xG 0.16–0.51 (24%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestJagr – Giroux – van Riemsdyk8:25

    xG 0.85–0.30 (74%)attempts 6–9goals 1–1

  2. Hartnell – Read – Couturier8:13

    xG 0.29–0.26 (53%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  3. Talbot – Nodl – Rinaldo5:05

    xG 0.03–0.27 (9%)attempts 2–8goals 0–1

  4. Brière – Voracek – Simmonds8:59

    xG 0.19–0.46 (29%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPronger – Carle6:04

    xG 0.46–0.05 (90%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. Timonen – Coburn6:03

    xG 0.50–0.16 (76%)attempts 6–4goals 1–1

  3. Carle – Meszaros2:01

    xG 0.12–0.21 (36%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.2 xGVAN 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #79 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.11 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).