Sun, Oct 16, 2011·Honda Center, Anaheim
St. Louis Blues 2, Anaheim Ducks 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 57% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 011 | 110 | 19 | 230 |
| ANA | 110 | 06 | 37 | 423 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 2:20ANABobby RyanPPAssists: Francois Beauchemin, Luca Sbisa · Snap, 0.22 xG0–1
- P2 5:43STLPatrik BerglundAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Kent Huskins · Deflected, 0.05 xG1–1
- P3 1:31ANAFrancois BeaucheminAssists: Bobby Ryan, Luca Sbisa · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
- P3 3:40ANACorey PerryPPGWGAssists: Teemu Selanne, Ryan Getzlaf · Deflected, 0.17 xG1–3
- P3 6:24ANABobby RyanAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Sheldon Brookbank · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–4
- P3 9:38STLAlexander SteenAssists: Jason Arnott, Barret Jackman · Snap, 0.08 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
- P1 0:20STLNikita Nikitin: Holding2 min · PPG
- P1 10:56ANAMaxime Macenauer: Slashing2 min
- P1 17:04ANAToni Lydman: Interference2 min
- P2 15:04STLChris Porter: Roughing2 min
- P2 15:04ANAMatt Beleskey: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
- P2 15:04ANAMatt Beleskey: Roughing2 min
- P2 19:19STLJason Arnott: High sticking2 min
- P3 1:59STLMatt D'Agostini: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 14:48STLVladimir Sobotka: Boarding2 min
- P3 15:43ANARyan Getzlaf: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Berglund won the faceoff against Getzlaf
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestSobotka – Stewart – Berglund12:02
xG 1.00–0.21 (82%)attempts 20–5goals 1–1
- Nichol – Porter – Grachev4:35
xG 0.01–0.02 (27%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Steen – Backes – D'Agostini2:20
xG 0.06–0.10 (36%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Arnott – Steen – D'Agostini5:14
xG 0.22–0.41 (35%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestHuskins – Pietrangelo10:06
xG 0.58–0.24 (71%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0
- Shattenkirk – Pietrangelo4:39
xG 0.07–0.03 (68%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0
- Jackman – Shattenkirk6:54
xG 0.29–0.31 (49%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestGetzlaf – Perry – Ryan12:29
xG 0.86–0.58 (60%)attempts 16–11goals 1–1
- Gordon – Cogliano – Smith-Pelly9:22
xG 0.39–0.25 (60%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0
- Selanne – Koivu – McMillan10:18
xG 0.11–0.22 (33%)attempts 4–12goals 0–1
- Parros – Beleskey – Macenauer3:56
xG 0.02–0.19 (10%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestLydman – Visnovsky15:29
xG 0.61–0.40 (60%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1
- Brookbank – Sbisa9:15
xG 0.39–0.29 (57%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0
- Beauchemin – Fowler15:26
xG 0.17–0.78 (18%)attempts 6–17goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 57% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ANA − STL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).