Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 23, 2011·Honda Center, Anaheim

Phoenix Coyotes 5, Anaheim Ducks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 52% of the time.

ANA winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHX210313012535
ANA29113111433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:41PHXMartin HanzalAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:21ANALubomir VisnovskyAssists: Corey Perry, Luca Sbisa · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:02ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Teemu Selanne, Cam Fowler · Deflected, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P1 14:44PHXMartin HanzalAssists: Keith Yandle · Slap, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:47PHXBoyd GordonAssists: Taylor Pyatt, Lauri Korpikoski · Wrist, 0.30 xG3–2
  6. P2 6:27PHXLauri KorpikoskiAssists: Taylor Pyatt, Adrian Aucoin · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P2 7:56PHXKeith YandleGWGAssists: Shane Doan, Ray Whitney · Wrist, 0.10 xG5–2
  8. P2 13:31ANAKurtis FosterAssists: Francois Beauchemin, Saku Koivu · Snap, 0.06 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:52ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Lubomir Visnovsky · Wrist, 0.07 xG5–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 11:01ANAMaxime Macenauer: Holding2 min
  2. P1 18:45PHXMartin Hanzal: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 9:55PHXRaffi Torres: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 9:55ANALuca Sbisa: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 11:27PHXMartin Hanzal: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 0:15ANAMaxime Macenauer: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 1:57PHXAndy Miele: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 9:27ANATeemu Selanne: Holding2 min
  9. P3 16:28PHXOliver Ekman-Larsson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
45% to win55% to win
← PHX attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cogliano won the faceoff against Gordon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXANA
35Shots on goal33
3.0Expected goals3.2
58Shot attempts54
31Faceoffs won25
3Power plays4
13Penalty minutes11
11Hits18
8Blocked shots9
9Giveaways15
7Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestWhitney – Langkow – Doan12:24

    xG 0.67–0.16 (81%)attempts 14–6goals 1–0

  2. Pyatt – Gordon – Korpikoski10:11

    xG 0.72–0.59 (55%)attempts 12–11goals 2–2

  3. Torres – O'Sullivan – Miele3:54

    xG 0.04–0.02 (62%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Vrbata – Hanzal – Boedker14:03

    xG 0.52–0.67 (44%)attempts 10–10goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAucoin – Ekman-Larsson10:45

    xG 0.51–0.17 (75%)attempts 13–3goals 1–0

  2. Morris – Yandle12:20

    xG 0.61–0.41 (60%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  3. Klesla – Schlemko13:06

    xG 0.60–0.78 (43%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestMacenauer – McMillan – Smith-Pelly2:58

    xG 0.26–0.16 (63%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Beleskey – Macenauer – Smith-Pelly2:40

    xG 0.05–0.08 (39%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Selanne – Koivu – McMillan6:36

    xG 0.28–0.32 (46%)attempts 5–5goals 0–2

  4. Gordon – Cogliano – Beleskey4:31

    xG 0.11–0.32 (26%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVisnovsky – Fowler2:56

    xG 0.21–0.07 (74%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  2. Beauchemin – Visnovsky2:48

    xG 0.10–0.05 (67%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

  3. Brookbank – Sbisa3:37

    xG 0.16–0.14 (53%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.2 xGPHX 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #144 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 52% of the time.

ANA winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).