Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 24, 2011·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Toronto Maple Leafs 2, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 71% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR1501219226
PHI19110211430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:11TORPhil KesselAssists: Joffrey Lupul, John-Michael Liles · Snap, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:22PHIJaromir JagrPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Kimmo Timonen · Snap, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 15:46PHIScott HartnellPPAssists: Daniel Brière · Snap, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P3 8:34PHIScott HartnellGWGAssists: Claude Giroux, Jaromir Jagr · Snap, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P3 11:34TORDavid SteckelAssists: Matt Frattin, Matthew Lombardi · Tip-in, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P3 15:15PHIJaromir JagrAssists: Scott Hartnell, Kimmo Timonen · Snap, 0.16 xG2–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:28TORMikhail Grabovski: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 3:46PHIJody Shelley: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:31TORJoffrey Lupul: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:20PHIMatt Carle: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 19:20PHIMax Talbot: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 19:20TORLuke Schenn: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:15TORMike Komisarek: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P2 0:00TORClarke MacArthur: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 1:42PHIDaniel Brière: Interference goalkeeper2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
45% to win55% to win
← TOR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Grabovski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORPHI
26Shots on goal30
2.3Expected goals3.6
43Shot attempts54
37Faceoffs won27
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes8
24Hits26
13Blocked shots10
6Giveaways11
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestMacArthur – Grabovski – Kulemin10:44

    xG 1.10–0.12 (90%)attempts 17–5goals 0–0

  2. Lombardi – Lupul – Kessel8:47

    xG 0.56–0.35 (62%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  3. Lombardi – Steckel – Frattin2:06

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 1–0

  4. Dupuis – Rosehill – Brown4:16

    xG 0.08–0.11 (41%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhaneuf – Gunnarsson11:10

    xG 0.55–0.25 (69%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Phaneuf – Gardiner3:34

    xG 0.22–0.11 (67%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Liles – Phaneuf2:13

    xG 0.42–0.37 (53%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestShelley – Talbot – Couturier4:33

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  2. Jagr – Hartnell – Giroux10:33

    xG 0.53–0.28 (66%)attempts 8–5goals 2–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Voracek – Read6:09

    xG 0.21–0.43 (33%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Brière – Simmonds – Schenn11:25

    xG 0.66–0.90 (42%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Meszaros9:58

    xG 0.93–0.43 (68%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Walker – Coburn6:11

    xG 0.62–0.22 (74%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  3. Timonen – Coburn6:24

    xG 0.42–0.10 (80%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.6 xGTOR 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHITOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #626 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.36 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 71% of the time.

PHI winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).