Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 29, 2011·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Washington Capitals 4, Vancouver Canucks 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 65% of the time.

VAN winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH110312010432
VAN317114312743

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:31VANMaxim LapierreAssists: Dale Weise, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:55WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: Troy Brouwer, Nicklas Backstrom · Deflected, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:17VANChris HigginsPPAssists: Dan Hamhuis, David Booth · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:56VANAlexander EdlerPPAssists: Sami Salo, Ryan Kesler · Slap, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P2 1:25WSHAlex OvechkinPPAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, John Carlson · Snap, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P2 5:07WSHMike KnubleUnassisted · Wrist, 0.41 xG3–3
  7. P2 8:00VANAlexander EdlerAssists: Henrik Sedin, Daniel Sedin · Snap, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P2 17:54WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: Dennis Wideman · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. P3 6:18VANHenrik SedinGWGAssists: Ryan Kesler, Alexander Edler · Wrist, 0.31 xG4–5
  10. P3 6:52VANChris HigginsAssists: Jannik Hansen, Manny Malhotra · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–6
  11. P3 10:25VANMaxim LapierreSHAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–7
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:55VANAlexander Sulzer: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 11:27WSHJoel Ward: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:49WSHAlexander Semin: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 16:42VANRyan Kesler: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 19:51WSHJeff Halpern: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P2 0:26VANDan Hamhuis: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 5:07VANAlexander Edler: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  8. P2 11:08WSHTroy Brouwer: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 4:15WSHAlex Ovechkin: Interference2 min
  10. P3 8:17VANSami Salo: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← WSH attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHVAN
32Shots on goal43
2.7Expected goals3.6
46Shot attempts70
26Faceoffs won39
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
11Hits25
18Blocked shots6
5Giveaways5
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestHalpern – Hendricks – Perreault2:22

    xG 0.09–0.01 (88%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  2. Laich – Semin – Johansson6:07

    xG 0.25–0.18 (58%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Knuble – Hendricks – Perreault4:24

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Chimera – Halpern – Ward4:44

    xG 0.13–0.19 (41%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamrlik – Wideman14:47

    xG 0.41–0.33 (55%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  2. Wideman – Schultz3:43

    xG 0.18–0.38 (32%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Schultz – Collins8:45

    xG 0.14–0.36 (27%)attempts 4–10goals 0–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestKesler – Booth – Hodgson8:15

    xG 0.63–0.13 (83%)attempts 15–3goals 0–1

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows11:49

    xG 0.37–0.25 (59%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  3. Lapierre – Weise – Volpatti9:48

    xG 0.27–0.27 (50%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  4. Malhotra – Higgins – Hansen7:24

    xG 0.01–0.48 (3%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Edler12:12

    xG 1.07–0.20 (84%)attempts 16–7goals 2–0

  2. Hamhuis – Bieksa14:40

    xG 0.65–0.32 (67%)attempts 16–8goals 2–0

  3. Bieksa – Edler2:19

    xG 0.17–0.01 (96%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.6 xGWSH 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #39 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.22 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 65% of the time.

VAN winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).