Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 30, 2011·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Anaheim Ducks 1, Columbus Blue Jackets 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 56% of the time.

CBJ winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA1301106120
CBJ1102704321

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:23CBJRick NashPPAssists: James Wisniewski, R.J. Umberger · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:24ANABobby RyanAssists: Teemu Selanne, Toni Lydman · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:57CBJRyan JohansenGWGAssists: Antoine Vermette, Matt Calvert · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:52CBJFedor TyutinAssists: James Wisniewski, Samuel Pahlsson · Slap, 0.02 xG1–3
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 1:36ANATeemu Selanne: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 1:36ANASaku Koivu: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 12:38ANASheldon Brookbank: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 12:38CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 17:01ANAAndrew Cogliano: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 17:01CBJKris Russell: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 17:45ANARyan Getzlaf: Fighting5 min
  8. P1 17:45CBJCody Bass: Fighting5 min
  9. P1 17:49ANATeemu Selanne: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 3:56CBJGrant Clitsome: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 5:57CBJJames Wisniewski: Cross checking2 min
  12. P2 14:24CBJFedor Tyutin: Roughing2 min
  13. P2 14:24ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  14. P2 18:17CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  15. P2 18:17ANASheldon Brookbank: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 11:32CBJSamuel Pahlsson: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← ANA attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Beauchemin won the faceoff against Pahlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACBJ
20Shots on goal21
1.5Expected goals1.8
43Shot attempts38
25Faceoffs won29
3Power plays3
28Penalty minutes28
31Hits23
7Blocked shots18
2Giveaways4
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSelanne – Koivu – Ryan6:44

    xG 0.23–0.06 (80%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  2. Selanne – Koivu – Macenauer4:11

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Gordon – Cogliano – Beleskey2:54

    xG 0.04–0.02 (69%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Ryan7:05

    xG 0.09–0.22 (28%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Beauchemin – Fowler15:43

    xG 0.37–0.33 (53%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Visnovsky – Fowler2:17

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  3. Visnovsky – Sbisa2:01

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Vermette – Johansen2:15

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Vermette – Calvert – Johansen7:01

    xG 0.25–0.01 (95%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  3. Pahlsson – Umberger – Bass10:26

    xG 0.30–0.11 (73%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  4. Prospal – Vermette – Nash3:29

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Russell6:45

    xG 0.60–0.25 (71%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  2. Tyutin – Wisniewski17:48

    xG 0.23–0.24 (48%)attempts 6–16goals 1–0

  3. Clitsome – Moore16:55

    xG 0.15–0.28 (35%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 1.8 xGANA 1.5 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 19/100 · #971 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 56% of the time.

CBJ winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).