Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 1, 2011·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 5, Calgary Flames 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 57% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN3142403521
CGY0801219129

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:57VANChris HigginsAssists: Jannik Hansen, Manny Malhotra · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:42VANAlexandre BurrowsPPGWGAssists: Ryan Kesler, Alexander Edler · Backhand, 0.23 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:41VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexander Edler · Snap, 0.08 xG3–0
  4. P2 3:47VANCody HodgsonAssists: Maxim Lapierre, Dale Weise · Snap, 0.16 xG4–0
  5. P2 11:43VANAlexander EdlerAssists: Cody Hodgson, David Booth · Slap, 0.06 xG5–0
  6. P3 19:28CGYAlex TanguayAssists: Tom Kostopoulos, Chris Butler · Deflected, 0.07 xG5–1
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 11:22CGYRene Bourque: Holding2 min
  2. P1 11:48CGYChris Butler: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:27CGYRoman Horak: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 12:41VANAaron Volpatti: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 16:24VANRyan Kesler: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 17:18CGYRoman Horak: Holding2 min
  7. P2 18:41VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 1:24VANHenrik Sedin: High sticking double minor4 min
  9. P3 5:58CGYScott Hannan: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 7:21CGYCory Sarich: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 12:54VANDaniel Sedin: Holding2 min
  12. P3 19:11CGYTim Jackman: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 19:11VANDale Weise: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Jokinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
21Shots on goal29
2.1Expected goals1.8
44Shot attempts53
37Faceoffs won20
6Power plays6
17Penalty minutes17
8Hits22
9Blocked shots11
9Giveaways15
10Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows9:24

    xG 0.36–0.18 (67%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Kesler – Booth – Hodgson7:39

    xG 0.15–0.12 (56%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  3. Lapierre – Weise – Volpatti8:24

    xG 0.16–0.17 (49%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  4. Malhotra – Higgins – Hansen8:21

    xG 0.09–0.22 (29%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa14:30

    xG 0.66–0.42 (61%)attempts 11–14goals 2–0

  2. Salo – Edler12:59

    xG 0.19–0.32 (37%)attempts 10–11goals 1–1

  3. Ballard – Sulzer11:00

    xG 0.03–0.25 (12%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestStempniak – Bourque – Horak5:07

    xG 0.18–0.09 (67%)attempts 3–2goals 0–1

  2. Jokinen – Moss – Glencross8:07

    xG 0.30–0.28 (52%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

  3. Morrison – Iginla – Tanguay6:55

    xG 0.14–0.21 (41%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Kostopoulos – Jackman – Stajan7:02

    xG 0.17–0.32 (35%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSarich – Smith9:24

    xG 0.33–0.13 (72%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Bouwmeester – Butler13:43

    xG 0.38–0.28 (58%)attempts 10–15goals 1–1

  3. Sarich – Giordano2:01

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 1.8 xGVAN 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1031 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.60 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 57% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).