Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 5, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

St. Louis Blues 1, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL05013113131
MIN05210011226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 11:39MINDany HeatleyAssists: Mikko Koivu, Nate Prosser · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 18:42MINGuillaume LatendresseGWGUnassisted · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P3 17:58STLJamie LangenbrunnerAssists: Vladimir Sobotka, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–2
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 11:54STLCarlo Colaiacovo: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 10:05STLKevin Shattenkirk: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 10:36MINMarek Zidlicky: Holding2 min
  4. P2 12:23MINJustin Falk: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 17:34MINDarroll Powe: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 17:34STLScott Nichol: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 19:06MINKyle Brodziak: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 19:06MINMarek Zidlicky: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 19:06STLJason Arnott: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:06MINNick Johnson: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 19:06STLJamie Langenbrunner: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 19:06STLRoman Polak: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 0:03MINGuillaume Latendresse: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 0:03STLDavid Backes: Cross checking2 min
  15. P3 0:03STLDavid Backes: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← STL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Cullen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLMIN
31Shots on goal26
2.9Expected goals2.7
60Shot attempts48
26Faceoffs won32
2Power plays3
19Penalty minutes17
17Hits16
9Blocked shots16
2Giveaways5
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestArnott – Langenbrunner – Steen8:21

    xG 0.51–0.22 (70%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Backes – Oshie – Grachev3:16

    xG 0.32–0.12 (73%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

  3. Nichol – Reaves – Grachev4:51

    xG 0.11–0.05 (69%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Backes – Oshie – Sobotka8:29

    xG 0.07–0.51 (12%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Pietrangelo3:07

    xG 0.26–0.05 (85%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Jackman – Shattenkirk11:00

    xG 0.48–0.29 (62%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  3. Colaiacovo – Pietrangelo14:54

    xG 0.93–0.76 (55%)attempts 20–12goals 1–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHeatley – Koivu – Latendresse14:09

    xG 0.75–0.45 (63%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  2. Cullen – Bouchard – Setoguchi13:19

    xG 0.41–0.29 (58%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  3. Staubitz – Powe – Gillies5:11

    xG 0.05–0.15 (24%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Brodziak – Johnson – Clutterbuck10:02

    xG 0.55–1.39 (28%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Spurgeon16:03

    xG 0.41–0.27 (61%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  2. Falk – Prosser15:39

    xG 0.81–1.14 (42%)attempts 15–18goals 0–1

  3. Schultz – Zidlicky14:57

    xG 0.62–0.98 (39%)attempts 6–19goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.7 xGSTL 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 12/100 · #1056 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.73 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).