Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 5, 2011·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Los Angeles Kings 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT11401018012333
LAK0811315001226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:45PITSteve SullivanPPAssists: Kris Letang, James Neal · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 13:34LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Justin Williams, Matt Greene · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P3 13:49LAKSimon GagneAssists: Anze Kopitar, Justin Williams · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 17:03PITChris KunitzAssists: Jordan Staal, Pascal Dupuis · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Jarret Stoll stopped
  2. 2. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
  3. 3. LAK Anze Kopitar scored
  4. 4. PIT Kris Letang scored
  5. 5. LAK Dustin Brown stopped
  6. 6. PIT James Neal stopped
  7. 7. LAK Simon Gagne stopped
  8. 8. PIT Chris Kunitz scored
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:37LAKSimon Gagne: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 8:27LAKEthan Moreau: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 12:50PITJames Neal: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 15:04LAKWillie Mitchell: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 16:34LAKEthan Moreau: Slashing2 min
  6. P1 16:38LAKRob Scuderi: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 1:11PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 1:53PITChris Kunitz: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P2 7:54PITRobert Bortuzzo: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 10:06LAKJarret Stoll: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Park won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITLAK
33Shots on goal26
3.6Expected goals2.8
65Shot attempts55
22Faceoffs won41
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes12
37Hits35
10Blocked shots16
10Giveaways15
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kunitz – Staal9:12

    xG 0.81–0.03 (96%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Sullivan – Malkin – Neal9:32

    xG 0.74–0.13 (85%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  3. Park – Adams – Letestu2:24

    xG 0.04–0.11 (27%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1

  4. Asham – Cooke – Vitale3:50

    xG 0.11–0.41 (20%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Letang3:05

    xG 0.38–0.02 (96%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Orpik – Bortuzzo6:44

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Orpik – Engelland5:58

    xG 0.50–0.34 (59%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestGagne – Williams – Kopitar11:06

    xG 0.75–0.14 (84%)attempts 14–7goals 2–0

  2. Richardson – Westgarth – Clifford2:05

    xG 0.01–0.18 (7%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Moreau – Stoll – Penner9:25

    xG 0.08–0.47 (15%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

  4. Brown – Richards – Parse10:57

    xG 0.25–1.06 (19%)attempts 6–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreene – Martinez10:06

    xG 1.03–0.34 (75%)attempts 17–9goals 2–0

  2. Mitchell – Greene2:32

    xG 0.02–0.17 (11%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Scuderi – Johnson16:29

    xG 0.22–0.52 (30%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.8 xGPIT 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #168 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 62% of the time.

LAK winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).