Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 6, 2011·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise

Tampa Bay Lightning 4, Florida Panthers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 51% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TBL09212110061437
FLA316012010030341

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:49FLABrian CampbellPPAssists: Kris Versteeg, Tomas Fleischmann · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:05FLATomas KopeckyAssists: Jack Skille, Mike Weaver · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:21FLAMike SantorelliAssists: Dmitry Kulikov · Snap, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 16:20TBLRyan MaloneAssists: Steven Stamkos, Eric Brewer · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:46TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Matt Gilroy, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 8:11TBLTeddy PurcellAssists: Steve Downie, Eric Brewer · Tip-in, 0.30 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TBL Steven Stamkos stopped
  2. 2. FLA Kris Versteeg stopped
  3. 3. TBL Steve Downie stopped
  4. 4. FLA Marcel Goc stopped
  5. 5. TBL Teddy Purcell stopped
  6. 6. FLA Stephen Weiss stopped
  7. 7. TBL Dominic Moore scored
  8. 8. FLA Sean Bergenheim stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 1:27TBLVincent Lecavalier: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:54FLAJack Skille: Holding2 min
  3. P2 15:18FLAMike Santorelli: Holding2 min
  4. P3 0:51TBLSteven Stamkos: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 9:26FLAKris Versteeg: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
45% to win55% to win
← TBL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Goc won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLFLA
37Shots on goal41
2.7Expected goals2.6
52Shot attempts64
26Faceoffs won34
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
29Hits19
11Blocked shots9
1Giveaways6
8Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Lecavalier – Stamkos10:53

    xG 0.49–0.34 (59%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  2. Moore – Thompson – Downie3:32

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Hall – Jones – Pyatt3:57

    xG 0.09–0.06 (62%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Moore – Thompson – Pyatt4:51

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Gilroy18:04

    xG 0.77–0.61 (56%)attempts 15–22goals 2–0

  2. Bergeron – Gilroy2:01

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Clark – Gervais2:18

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestKopecky – Upshall – Santorelli9:56

    xG 0.67–0.47 (59%)attempts 18–6goals 1–1

  2. Bradley – Bergenheim – Matthias6:45

    xG 0.17–0.09 (65%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Sturm – Bradley – Matthias2:05

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Goc – Bergenheim – Skille2:50

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Garrison20:10

    xG 1.15–0.35 (77%)attempts 25–8goals 1–0

  2. Weaver – Kulikov13:24

    xG 0.62–0.61 (50%)attempts 18–13goals 1–1

  3. Jovanovski – Ellerby12:20

    xG 0.07–0.29 (20%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.6 xGTBL 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLATBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #157 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.68 · 6 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 51% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).