Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 6, 2011·United Center, Chicago

Vancouver Canucks 6, Chicago Blackhawks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 55% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN11741318638
CHI19120011240

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:00VANDavid BoothPPAssists: Cody Hodgson, Chris Higgins · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:57CHIMichael FrolikAssists: Niklas Hjalmarsson · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:16VANAaron RomePPAssists: Cody Hodgson, David Booth · Slap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:40VANDaniel SedinPPGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 15:07CHIMarcus KrugerAssists: Jamal Mayers, Viktor Stalberg · Backhand, 0.31 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:50VANJannik HansenAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–2
  7. P2 17:50VANDan HamhuisPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexander Edler · Slap, 0.03 xG5–2
  8. P3 9:26VANHenrik SedinPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Daniel Sedin · Backhand, 0.17 xG6–2
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 4:17CHIBrent Seabrook: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:09VANDavid Booth: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 14:06VANAndrew Alberts: Elbowing2 min
  4. P1 15:28CHIDaniel Carcillo: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 19:42CHIPatrick Kane: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 3:53CHIBryan Bickell: Boarding2 min · PPG
  7. P2 6:55VANMaxim Lapierre: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 9:39VANAndrew Alberts: Holding2 min
  9. P2 13:00VANAaron Volpatti: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 13:00CHIDaniel Carcillo: Fighting5 min · PPG
  11. P2 16:11CHIViktor Stalberg: High sticking2 min
  12. P2 0:00VANKevin Bieksa: Fighting5 min
  13. P2 0:00CHIJamal Mayers: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 0:50VANChris Higgins: Holding2 min
  15. P3 9:06VANAaron Rome: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 9:06CHIDaniel Carcillo: Roughing2 min · PPG
  17. P3 9:06CHIDaniel Carcillo: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  18. P3 9:06CHIDaniel Carcillo: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCHI
38Shots on goal40
3.7Expected goals4.0
64Shot attempts55
30Faceoffs won31
6Power plays5
22Penalty minutes34
26Hits20
8Blocked shots18
1Giveaways4
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Hansen5:23

    xG 0.62–0.14 (82%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Booth2:18

    xG 0.30–0.04 (90%)attempts 6–3goals 0–1

  3. Higgins – Kesler – Booth8:04

    xG 0.31–0.08 (80%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  4. Lapierre – Weise – Volpatti8:34

    xG 0.31–0.10 (75%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAlberts – Rome2:35

    xG 0.17–0.03 (87%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Rome3:29

    xG 0.31–0.18 (64%)attempts 3–5goals 1–0

  3. Bieksa – Alberts10:49

    xG 0.89–0.78 (53%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Sharp – Kane8:02

    xG 0.57–0.45 (56%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Brunette – Stalberg – Toews7:24

    xG 0.47–0.46 (51%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Mayers – Carcillo – Kruger4:34

    xG 0.11–0.12 (49%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Bolland – Bickell – Frolik5:40

    xG 0.03–0.70 (3%)attempts 3–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontador – Lepisto5:26

    xG 1.23–0.01 (100%)attempts 12–2goals 1–0

  2. Montador – Leddy7:03

    xG 0.13–0.30 (31%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. O'Donnell – Leddy6:56

    xG 0.09–0.40 (19%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.0 xGVAN 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #497 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.53 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 55% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).