Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 12, 2011·RBC Center, Raleigh

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Carolina Hurricanes 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 52% of the time.

CAR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT010013317340
CAR1528213526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:22CARJeff SkinnerAssists: Jussi Jokinen, Tomas Kaberle · Backhand, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 15:51CARTuomo RuutuAssists: Jeff Skinner, Jussi Jokinen · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:03CARTuomo RuutuAssists: Jeff Skinner · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–3
  4. P3 1:40PITJordan StaalAssists: Evgeni Malkin, James Neal · Snap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:43PITJordan StaalSHAssists: Matt Cooke, Brooks Orpik · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:18PITChris KunitzAssists: Pascal Dupuis · Snap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 15:26CAREric StaalGWGAssists: Tim Gleason, Chad LaRose · Wrist, 0.34 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:30CARChad LaRoseAssists: Eric Staal, Jay Harrison · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–5
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 4:05CARBryan Allen: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 4:05PITArron Asham: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 9:32CARZac Dalpe: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 10:55CARJay Harrison: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 10:55PITJames Neal: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 10:55PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 10:55CARPatrick Dwyer: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 17:08PITJordan Staal: Tripping2 min
  9. P1 17:17CARJamie McBain: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 1:29PITMatt Niskanen: High sticking2 min
  11. P2 3:44CARJay Harrison: Interference2 min
  12. P2 4:17CARTim Brent: Tripping2 min
  13. P3 4:31PITArron Asham: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 10:04PITBrooks Orpik: Tripping2 min
  15. P3 19:30CARChad LaRose: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sutter won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCAR
40Shots on goal26
3.2Expected goals3.1
76Shot attempts44
33Faceoffs won33
5Power plays4
17Penalty minutes19
28Hits32
10Blocked shots20
2Giveaways13
11Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestSullivan – Malkin – Neal7:12

    xG 0.65–0.13 (84%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Dupuis – Kunitz – Staal7:38

    xG 0.26–0.08 (75%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Cooke – Vitale – Tangradi2:14

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Adams – Vitale – Tangradi4:25

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPicard – Niskanen12:01

    xG 0.58–0.39 (60%)attempts 16–4goals 1–1

  2. Orpik – Engelland12:15

    xG 0.48–0.35 (58%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

  3. Martin – Letang13:10

    xG 0.98–1.51 (40%)attempts 17–13goals 0–3

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestLaRose – Staal – Sutter11:39

    xG 0.97–0.69 (59%)attempts 11–14goals 1–1

  2. Ruutu – Jokinen – Skinner10:12

    xG 0.41–0.18 (69%)attempts 8–9goals 3–0

  3. Ponikarovsky – Brent – Dwyer7:36

    xG 0.24–0.15 (62%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Tlusty – Boychuk – Dalpe2:39

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGleason – Harrison15:13

    xG 1.22–1.15 (51%)attempts 13–18goals 1–1

  2. Kaberle – Joslin11:33

    xG 0.30–0.35 (46%)attempts 9–13goals 2–0

  3. Allen – McBain11:51

    xG 0.29–0.39 (42%)attempts 6–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.1 xGPIT 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #111 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.63 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 52% of the time.

CAR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).