Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 19, 2011·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Nashville Predators 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 67% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CBJ092121612429
NSH1711011201330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:29NSHColin WilsonPPAssists: David Legwand, Craig Smith · Wrist, 0.48 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:29CBJJeff CarterAssists: Rick Nash · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:27NSHMike FisherPPAssists: Shea Weber, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.47 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:29CBJVinny ProspalPPAssists: Rick Nash, Fedor Tyutin · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:45CBJR.J. UmbergerPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, James Wisniewski · Wrist, 0.50 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:24NSHNick SpalingAssists: Shea Weber, Ryan Suter · Snap, 0.16 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:43CBJJames WisniewskiGWGAssists: Antoine Vermette · Slap, 0.04 xG4–3
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 0:03NSHJordin Tootoo: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 0:03CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 1:02NSHBrian McGrattan: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 1:02CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 1:59NSHMatt Halischuk: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 6:35CBJDerek Dorsett: Misconduct10 min
  7. P1 6:35CBJDerek Dorsett: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P1 6:35NSHJack Hillen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P1 10:31NSHSergei Kostitsyn: Hooking2 min
  10. P1 17:09CBJMarc Methot: Interference2 min · PPG
  11. P2 10:04CBJRyan Johansen: Hooking2 min · PPG
  12. P2 11:21NSHFrancis Bouillon: Delaying game2 min · PPG
  13. P3 1:34NSHRyan Suter: Roughing2 min · PPG
  14. P3 2:47NSHRyan Suter: Hooking2 min
  15. P3 5:08CBJMarc Methot: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
45% to win55% to win
← CBJ attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pahlsson won the faceoff against Smith
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJNSH
29Shots on goal30
2.1Expected goals3.0
52Shot attempts49
33Faceoffs won39
5Power plays3
28Penalty minutes22
13Hits10
7Blocked shots10
4Giveaways8
6Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestProspal – Nash – Carter14:33

    xG 0.56–0.44 (56%)attempts 19–14goals 1–0

  2. Pahlsson – Vermette – Dorsett9:24

    xG 0.10–0.13 (43%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Pahlsson – Vermette – Boll2:14

    xG 0.07–0.11 (40%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Umberger – Letestu – Johansen8:29

    xG 0.14–0.26 (34%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Nikitin17:50

    xG 0.54–0.43 (55%)attempts 19–14goals 0–0

  2. Clitsome – Moore5:28

    xG 0.07–0.21 (25%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Wisniewski – Methot15:47

    xG 0.26–0.72 (26%)attempts 6–11goals 1–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Hornqvist – Wilson7:26

    xG 0.27–0.08 (77%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Tootoo – Halischuk – Smith5:17

    xG 0.17–0.10 (63%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. McGrattan – Smithson – Spaling6:39

    xG 0.17–0.15 (54%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  4. Hornqvist – Wilson – Smith4:26

    xG 0.04–0.06 (44%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Weber16:04

    xG 0.68–0.37 (65%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

  2. Bouillon – Klein15:42

    xG 0.49–0.26 (65%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Blum – Hillen13:28

    xG 0.36–0.34 (52%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.0 xGCBJ 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #99 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.44 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 67% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).