Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 20, 2011·Pepsi Center, Denver

San Jose Sharks 4, Colorado Avalanche 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 72% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS162913418
COL19014014137

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:25COLMatt DucheneAssists: Ryan Wilson, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:16SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:35SJSPatrick MarleauGWGAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Ryane Clowe · Tip-in, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 16:47SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Joe Thornton, Logan Couture · Snap, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P3 19:17SJSPatrick MarleauENAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.54 xG4–1
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:15COLKyle Quincey: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 19:14COLGabriel Landeskog: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 1:50COLRyan O'Byrne: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 8:38SJSDan Boyle: Interference2 min
  5. P2 19:25COLChuck Kobasew: Interference2 min
  6. P3 12:10COLBrandon Yip: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 17:30COLErik Johnson: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P3 17:30COLShane O'Brien: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Marleau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
18Shots on goal37
2.7Expected goals1.6
47Shot attempts54
33Faceoffs won21
6Power plays1
2Penalty minutes22
9Hits18
10Blocked shots15
2Giveaways4
5Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Clowe – Mitchell9:21

    xG 0.47–0.29 (62%)attempts 8–12goals 1–1

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Couture9:34

    xG 0.31–0.15 (67%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  3. Handzus – Havlat – McGinn9:22

    xG 0.12–0.14 (47%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  4. Winchester – Murray – Desjardins7:38

    xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Vlasic12:03

    xG 0.56–0.32 (64%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  2. White – Burns2:18

    xG 0.20–0.04 (81%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  3. Vlasic – Braun5:10

    xG 0.34–0.19 (64%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestHejduk – Duchene – Landeskog13:20

    xG 0.56–0.39 (58%)attempts 16–6goals 0–1

  2. Kobasew – McClement – Galiardi4:18

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  3. Porter – Yip – Stastny5:44

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Jones – Winnik – O'Reilly7:23

    xG 0.21–0.25 (46%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Wilson8:01

    xG 0.35–0.19 (65%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. O'Byrne – Wilson7:08

    xG 0.12–0.04 (76%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Hejda – Johnson5:03

    xG 0.29–0.26 (53%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.6 xGSJS 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 33/100 · #797 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 72% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).