Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Nov 28, 2011·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

San Jose Sharks 0, Los Angeles Kings 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 64% of the time.

LAK winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS01109013033
LAK1161908233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:37LAKEthan MoreauGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:16LAKMike RichardsAssists: Simon Gagne, Willie Mitchell · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 16:06SJSFrazer McLaren: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  2. P2 4:01LAKJarret Stoll: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P2 4:01SJSJoe Thornton: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 7:36LAKJustin Williams: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 12:23SJSJoe Thornton: Holding2 min
  6. P2 15:24LAKJarret Stoll: Holding2 min
  7. P2 17:52LAKMatt Greene: Interference2 min
  8. P3 4:26SJSJim Vandermeer: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 5:45LAKTrent Hunter: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 10:14LAKDrew Doughty: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 0:00SJSRyane Clowe: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 0:00SJSRyane Clowe: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 0:00LAKJack Johnson: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Marleau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSLAK
33Shots on goal33
2.8Expected goals2.1
75Shot attempts58
40Faceoffs won29
5Power plays3
12Penalty minutes14
20Hits30
12Blocked shots19
15Giveaways17
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Havlat – Clowe6:06

    xG 0.78–0.25 (76%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Couture8:32

    xG 0.25–0.14 (64%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  3. Winchester – Desjardins – McLaren3:24

    xG 0.05–0.03 (62%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Murray – Mitchell – McGinn6:03

    xG 0.05–0.09 (36%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoyle – Murray12:17

    xG 0.83–0.42 (66%)attempts 10–17goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Vlasic11:33

    xG 0.36–0.24 (60%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  3. Vandermeer – Braun7:38

    xG 0.16–0.14 (54%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestHunter – Brown – Kopitar12:50

    xG 0.63–0.19 (77%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0

  2. Gagne – Stoll – Richards7:12

    xG 0.24–0.05 (82%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Moreau – Fraser – Westgarth4:57

    xG 0.09–0.02 (80%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  4. Williams – Loktionov – Clifford6:06

    xG 0.07–0.96 (7%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Doughty14:16

    xG 0.67–0.47 (59%)attempts 16–16goals 0–0

  2. Greene – Johnson8:09

    xG 0.29–0.12 (71%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Voynov2:00

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.1 xGSJS 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 1/100 · #1219 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.58 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 64% of the time.

LAK winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).