Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 1, 2011·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Nashville Predators 6, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 94% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH352916620
VAN1742109537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:44NSHDavid LegwandPPAssists: Colin Wilson, Craig Smith · Slap, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:16NSHMike FisherAssists: Martin Erat, Shea Weber · Backhand, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P1 9:58VANCody HodgsonPPAssists: Chris Higgins, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P1 19:50NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Colin Wilson, Craig Smith · Slap, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 3:10VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexander Edler · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P2 3:58VANAaron VolpattiAssists: Maxim Lapierre, Andrew Alberts · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. P2 8:16VANAlexandre BurrowsAssists: Henrik Sedin, Daniel Sedin · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–4
  8. P2 10:29VANJannik HansenAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Kevin Bieksa · Slap, 0.02 xG3–5
  9. P2 16:09NSHJordin TootooAssists: Matt Halischuk, Nick Spaling · Slap, 0.15 xG4–5
  10. P2 17:30NSHColin WilsonPPAssists: David Legwand, Craig Smith · Backhand, 0.12 xG5–5
  11. P3 18:44NSHMike FisherGWGAssists: Martin Erat, Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.10 xG6–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:34NSHCraig Smith: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 4:42VANDan Hamhuis: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 8:41NSHShea Weber: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 14:45NSHMartin Erat: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 18:49VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 2:47NSHJerred Smithson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 16:36VANRyan Kesler: Interference2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← NSH attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHVAN
20Shots on goal37
1.5Expected goals5.0
37Shot attempts81
29Faceoffs won35
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
29Hits29
21Blocked shots12
3Giveaways8
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Hornqvist – Wilson11:06

    xG 0.20–0.14 (59%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  2. McGrattan – Smithson – Wilson5:01

    xG 0.20–0.16 (54%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Fisher – Erat – Smith13:28

    xG 0.38–1.58 (19%)attempts 6–22goals 2–0

  4. Tootoo – Halischuk – Spaling11:59

    xG 0.32–1.56 (17%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Suter – Weber18:41

    xG 0.52–0.59 (47%)attempts 12–16goals 2–0

  2. Blum – Josi9:05

    xG 0.27–0.58 (31%)attempts 10–12goals 1–1

  3. Klein – Hillen18:23

    xG 0.21–2.68 (7%)attempts 7–35goals 0–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows14:55

    xG 2.14–0.08 (96%)attempts 26–5goals 1–1

  2. Higgins – Kesler – Booth12:08

    xG 1.26–0.20 (87%)attempts 18–1goals 0–0

  3. Malhotra – Hansen – Hodgson6:50

    xG 0.36–0.24 (60%)attempts 8–3goals 1–1

  4. Lapierre – Weise – Volpatti6:53

    xG 0.16–0.26 (38%)attempts 6–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRome – Edler16:58

    xG 2.01–0.16 (92%)attempts 31–5goals 1–1

  2. Hamhuis – Bieksa17:22

    xG 1.46–0.57 (72%)attempts 23–12goals 1–1

  3. Alberts – Ballard12:40

    xG 0.71–0.33 (68%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 5.0 xGNSH 1.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #18 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.49 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 94% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).