Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 13, 2011·Pepsi Center, Denver

San Jose Sharks 3, Colorado Avalanche 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS0112719031330
COL11101129022433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:43COLStefan ElliottUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:16SJSJamie McGinnPPAssists: Dan Boyle, Michal Handzus · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:39SJSDan BoyleAssists: Joe Pavelski, Torrey Mitchell · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:31COLDaniel WinnikAssists: Erik Johnson, Kyle Quincey · Wrap-around, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:51COLMatt DuchenePPAssists: Milan Hejduk, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:38SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Logan Couture, Joe Thornton · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. COL Milan Hejduk scored
  2. 2. SJS Michal Handzus stopped
  3. 3. COL Matt Duchene stopped
  4. 4. SJS Martin Havlat stopped
  5. 5. COL Ryan O'Reilly stopped
  6. 6. SJS Joe Pavelski scored
  7. 7. COL David Jones stopped
  8. 8. SJS Ryane Clowe stopped
  9. 9. COL Gabriel Landeskog scored
  10. 10. SJS Brad Winchester stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 11:46COLCody McLeod: Charging2 min
  2. P2 1:25COLTJ Galiardi: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P3 4:44SJSMartin Havlat: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 4:44COLShane O'Brien: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P3 10:16SJSColin White: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
30Shots on goal33
2.0Expected goals1.8
54Shot attempts60
36Faceoffs won26
2Power plays1
4Penalty minutes6
9Hits30
15Blocked shots17
3Giveaways7
6Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestWinchester – Murray – Desjardins7:13

    xG 0.24–0.03 (88%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Mitchell12:29

    xG 0.32–0.23 (58%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  3. Marleau – Clowe – Couture6:43

    xG 0.19–0.18 (51%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Handzus – Marleau – McGinn2:49

    xG 0.01–0.04 (21%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Demers13:15

    xG 0.41–0.31 (57%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

  2. White – Vlasic2:10

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. White – Braun12:13

    xG 0.30–0.31 (49%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestMcClement – Jones – Galiardi2:20

    xG 0.20–0.02 (92%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Winnik – Stastny – Duchene2:51

    xG 0.17–0.04 (82%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. McClement – Jones – Winnik5:11

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 1–0

  4. Stastny – Galiardi – Duchene7:48

    xG 0.28–0.22 (56%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Johnson12:48

    xG 0.59–0.31 (66%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  2. O'Byrne – Quincey12:43

    xG 0.32–0.23 (58%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  3. O'Byrne – Hejda3:53

    xG 0.13–0.09 (58%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.8 xGSJS 2.0 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #83 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.58 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 22% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).