Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 14, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Minnesota Wild 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CHI01121017032431
MIN02210116020330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 9:19CHIMarian HossaPPAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Sharp · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 10:48CHIMichael FrolikAssists: Marcus Kruger, Jamal Mayers · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:10MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Nick Johnson · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:41MINMatt CullenAssists: Cal Clutterbuck, Warren Peters · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:54CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Viktor Stalberg · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:56MINMikko KoivuAssists: Cal Clutterbuck, Clayton Stoner · Snap, 0.09 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Matt Cullen stopped
  2. 2. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  3. 3. MIN Dany Heatley stopped
  4. 4. CHI Patrick Kane scored
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 3:29CHIDaniel Carcillo: Fighting5 min
  2. P2 3:29MINBrad Staubitz: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 7:06MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 8:20MINMatt Cullen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  5. P2 17:37CHISteve Montador: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 8:01CHIDaniel Carcillo: Elbowing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIMIN
31Shots on goal30
2.6Expected goals2.4
69Shot attempts53
30Faceoffs won35
2Power plays2
9Penalty minutes9
11Hits18
10Blocked shots16
5Giveaways10
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Bolland – Bickell8:06

    xG 0.48–0.14 (77%)attempts 10–3goals 0–1

  2. Stalberg – Toews – Kane15:50

    xG 0.93–0.75 (56%)attempts 21–14goals 1–0

  3. Hossa – Sharp – Kruger10:07

    xG 0.12–0.30 (29%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook21:51

    xG 1.04–0.55 (65%)attempts 24–17goals 2–0

  2. Hjalmarsson – Leddy19:33

    xG 0.75–0.81 (48%)attempts 17–16goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHeatley – Koivu – Powe15:03

    xG 0.96–0.39 (71%)attempts 18–16goals 0–0

  2. Cullen – Peters – Clutterbuck3:25

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  3. Brodziak – Johnson – Gillies12:27

    xG 0.28–0.18 (60%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  4. Peters – Staubitz – Almond3:07

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Zidlicky – Stoner12:24

    xG 0.59–0.56 (51%)attempts 15–10goals 2–1

  2. Schultz – Lundin17:25

    xG 0.27–0.50 (35%)attempts 8–16goals 0–1

  3. Scandella – Spurgeon20:36

    xG 0.58–0.95 (38%)attempts 13–28goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.4 xGCHI 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #86 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.40 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).