Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 16, 2011·Scotiabank Place, Ottawa

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Ottawa Senators 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT011313112436
OTT0951015624

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:25OTTColin GreeningAssists: Jason Spezza, Jared Cowen · Tip-in, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:35PITSteve SullivanAssists: Arron Asham, Joe Vitale · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:04OTTJason SpezzaAssists: Daniel Alfredsson, Erik Karlsson · Slap, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:45OTTDaniel AlfredssonAssists: Jason Spezza, Brian Lee · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 11:07PITMatt NiskanenPPAssists: Steve Sullivan, Chris Kunitz · Slap, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P2 12:14PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Steve Sullivan, James Neal · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. P2 13:20OTTJared CowenAssists: Nick Foligno, Erik Karlsson · Deflected, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P2 19:54OTTZenon KonopkaPPGWGAssists: Erik Karlsson, Jared Cowen · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–5
  9. P3 12:23OTTJason SpezzaAssists: Daniel Alfredsson, Jared Cowen · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–6
  10. P3 18:58PITChris KunitzAssists: Simon Despres, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.11 xG4–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:27PITMatt Niskanen: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:27PITArron Asham: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 10:27OTTChris Neil: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 7:20OTTKaspars Daugavins: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P2 11:00OTTChris Neil: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 12:06OTTDaniel Alfredsson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 14:05OTTMatt Carkner: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 16:09PITPascal Dupuis: Holding the stick2 min
  9. P2 19:50PITAlexandre Picard: High sticking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 12:55PITJames Neal: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 14:52PITSimon Despres: Kneeing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dupuis won the faceoff against Spezza
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITOTT
36Shots on goal24
2.8Expected goals2.5
75Shot attempts48
30Faceoffs won36
4Power plays5
12Penalty minutes10
22Hits29
17Blocked shots25
4Giveaways5
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAdams – MacIntyre – Tangradi3:11

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Sullivan – Asham – Vitale7:46

    xG 0.47–0.27 (64%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  3. Cooke – Dupuis – Kennedy9:30

    xG 0.59–0.61 (49%)attempts 17–10goals 0–2

  4. Kunitz – Malkin – Neal13:10

    xG 0.33–0.51 (39%)attempts 19–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPicard – Despres7:35

    xG 0.92–0.15 (86%)attempts 13–4goals 1–0

  2. Picard – Niskanen2:24

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Orpik – Engelland4:52

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestAlfredsson – Spezza – Greening10:03

    xG 0.54–0.23 (70%)attempts 6–9goals 3–0

  2. Neil – Regin – Foligno4:43

    xG 0.20–0.23 (46%)attempts 6–3goals 1–1

  3. Daugavins – Condra – Smith11:13

    xG 0.56–1.04 (35%)attempts 14–23goals 0–1

  4. Konopka – Winchester – Butler6:46

    xG 0.02–0.59 (3%)attempts 2–17goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Lee – Rundblad2:01

    xG 0.12–0.14 (47%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

  2. Carkner – Lee2:01

    xG 0.04–0.10 (31%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Phillips – Carkner12:08

    xG 0.43–0.51 (46%)attempts 14–20goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.5 xGPIT 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #121 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.71 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).