Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 22, 2011·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Minnesota Wild 1, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 60% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN03013115131
EDM2202902431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:57EDMJordan EberlePPUnassisted · Snap, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:36EDMRyan SmythGWGAssists: Ladislav Smid, Tom Gilbert · Wrist, 0.41 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:40EDMLennart PetrellSHUnassisted · Snap, 0.08 xG0–3
  4. P2 2:56EDMJordan EberleAssists: Corey Potter, Ryan Whitney · Backhand, 0.06 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:57MINDany HeatleyAssists: Matt Cullen, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.03 xG1–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:04MINWarren Peters: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 8:10EDMDarcy Hordichuk: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 10:37MINClayton Stoner: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 15:11MINJustin Falk: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:48MINClayton Stoner: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  6. P1 0:00EDMBen Eager: Boarding2 min
  7. P2 10:29MINPierre-Marc Bouchard: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P2 19:01EDMSam Gagner: High sticking double minor4 min
  9. P3 2:50EDMLennart Petrell: Game misconduct10 min
  10. P3 2:50EDMLennart Petrell: Checking from behind5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horcoff won the faceoff against Brodziak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINEDM
31Shots on goal31
2.7Expected goals3.2
76Shot attempts51
32Faceoffs won20
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes23
15Hits17
9Blocked shots25
14Giveaways14
7Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestOrtmeyer – Staubitz – Powe6:37

    xG 0.26–0.17 (61%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

  2. Taffe – Peters – Palmer5:39

    xG 0.09–0.02 (82%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Brodziak – Johnson – Clutterbuck9:38

    xG 0.34–0.43 (44%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Heatley – Bouchard10:25

    xG 0.75–1.32 (36%)attempts 18–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestZidlicky – Falk3:43

    xG 0.37–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–0goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Falk3:54

    xG 0.33–0.17 (66%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

  3. Schultz – Zidlicky9:41

    xG 0.56–0.69 (45%)attempts 15–9goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Hall – Nugent-Hopkins9:14

    xG 0.90–0.20 (82%)attempts 20–4goals 1–0

  2. Smyth – Horcoff – Gagner9:29

    xG 0.65–0.43 (60%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

  3. Hordichuk – Petrell – Lander3:09

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Belanger – Jones – Lander2:03

    xG 0.08–0.01 (87%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Peckham9:08

    xG 0.72–0.29 (71%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0

  2. Gilbert – Smid11:07

    xG 1.11–0.70 (61%)attempts 12–17goals 1–0

  3. Smid – Petry2:07

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.2 xGMIN 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1024 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.65 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 60% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).