Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 23, 2011·Madison Square Garden, New York

Philadelphia Flyers 2, New York Rangers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 54% of the time.

NYR winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI08011211230
NYR082729424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 10:18NYRDerek StepanAssists: Stu Bickel · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P2 15:29NYRRuslan FedotenkoAssists: Stu Bickel, Brandon Dubinsky · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P3 1:48NYRMarian GaborikGWGAssists: Anton Stralman, Michael Del Zotto · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–3
  4. P3 10:21PHIAndrej MeszarosPPAssists: Matt Carle, Scott Hartnell · Slap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 14:04NYRRyan CallahanPPAssists: Dan Girardi, Michael Del Zotto · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–4
  6. P3 17:50PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Andrej Meszaros, Matt Read · Wrist, 0.40 xG2–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:38NYRBrandon Dubinsky: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 12:22PHIWayne Simmonds: Holding2 min
  3. P1 16:07PHIMarc-Andre Bourdon: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:07NYRBrandon Prust: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 3:22PHIKimmo Timonen: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 4:47PHIHarry Zolnierczyk: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 6:54NYRBrad Richards: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 12:11PHITom Sestito: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 12:11NYRBrian Boyle: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 2:19NYRTim Erixon: Holding2 min
  11. P3 9:16NYRArtem Anisimov: Holding2 min · PPG
  12. P3 13:49PHIMax Talbot: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
45% to win55% to win
← PHI attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Talbot won the faceoff against Boyle
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHINYR
30Shots on goal24
3.4Expected goals3.6
62Shot attempts53
23Faceoffs won29
4Power plays4
18Penalty minutes18
24Hits35
15Blocked shots16
6Giveaways5
2Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Simmonds – Read9:35

    xG 0.82–0.58 (59%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

  2. Talbot – Sestito – Voracek6:00

    xG 0.54–0.41 (57%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. Talbot – Voracek – Zolnierczyk2:22

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Jagr – Hartnell – Giroux14:02

    xG 0.55–0.50 (52%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Meszaros6:38

    xG 0.55–0.19 (74%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  2. Timonen – Coburn12:54

    xG 0.75–0.44 (63%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

  3. Carle – Bourdon7:59

    xG 0.65–0.34 (66%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Mitchell – Dubinsky7:53

    xG 0.67–0.01 (98%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Richards – Callahan – Hagelin11:08

    xG 0.49–0.26 (66%)attempts 9–14goals 0–0

  3. Gaborik – Anisimov – Stepan9:48

    xG 0.29–0.42 (41%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  4. Rupp – Fedotenko – Prust4:06

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStralman – Del Zotto17:23

    xG 1.63–0.94 (63%)attempts 21–15goals 1–0

  2. Bickel – Erixon8:50

    xG 0.09–0.22 (29%)attempts 2–4goals 1–0

  3. Girardi – McDonagh16:35

    xG 0.74–1.00 (43%)attempts 16–22goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 3.6 xGPHI 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #698 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.77 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 54% of the time.

NYR winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).