Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 23, 2011·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

Los Angeles Kings 1, San Jose Sharks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK0711009030129
SJS05115014011235

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 7:53SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Ryane Clowe, Patrick Marleau · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P2 18:52LAKMike RichardsPPAssists: Anze Kopitar, Drew Doughty · Snap, 0.08 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  2. 2. LAK Jarret Stoll stopped
  3. 3. SJS Michal Handzus stopped
  4. 4. LAK Anze Kopitar stopped
  5. 5. SJS Dan Boyle stopped
  6. 6. LAK Dustin Brown stopped
  7. 7. SJS Ryane Clowe scored
  8. 8. LAK Mike Richards stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:55LAKTrent Hunter: Interference2 min
  2. P1 13:08SJSJason Demers: Interference2 min
  3. P1 17:56LAKDustin Brown: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 9:52LAKJarret Stoll: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 10:59SJSRyane Clowe: Interference2 min
  6. P2 13:58SJSAndrew Desjardins: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 13:58LAKColin Fraser: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 17:55SJSLogan Couture: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P3 6:26LAKBrad Richardson: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 11:51LAKJustin Williams: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
45% to win55% to win
← LAK attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKSJS
29Shots on goal35
1.6Expected goals2.5
61Shot attempts76
27Faceoffs won25
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes8
28Hits18
24Blocked shots20
8Giveaways8
8Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Richardson – Kopitar11:27

    xG 0.43–0.24 (64%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  2. Gagne – Richards – Lewis9:00

    xG 0.07–0.23 (23%)attempts 5–12goals 0–0

  3. Hunter – Fraser – Clifford6:00

    xG 0.20–0.42 (32%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  4. Williams – Stoll – Penner9:21

    xG 0.20–0.42 (32%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreene – Johnson7:56

    xG 0.54–0.19 (74%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  2. Mitchell – Johnson3:11

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Scuderi – Doughty15:55

    xG 0.25–0.65 (28%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Ferriero9:12

    xG 0.46–0.08 (85%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. Marleau – Clowe – Couture11:28

    xG 0.35–0.15 (70%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  3. Winchester – Murray – Desjardins4:55

    xG 0.30–0.11 (73%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Handzus – Mitchell – McGinn9:29

    xG 0.26–0.44 (37%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWhite – Burns3:11

    xG 0.26–0.06 (82%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Demers10:16

    xG 0.57–0.39 (59%)attempts 14–13goals 0–0

  3. White – Braun8:26

    xG 0.15–0.08 (65%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.5 xGLAK 1.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #629 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.47 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 67% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).