Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 26, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 4, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL07212213432
MIN181509222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:31MINPierre-Marc BouchardPPAssists: Dany Heatley, Kyle Brodziak · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:34COLRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Matt Duchene · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:00MINCal ClutterbuckAssists: Mikko Koivu, Dany Heatley · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:58COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: David Van Der Gulik, TJ Galiardi · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:20COLJan HejdaGWGAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, David Van Der Gulik · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:06COLTJ GaliardiAssists: Jan Hejda · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:37COLShane O'Brien: Interference2 min
  2. P1 3:04MINNick Johnson: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 5:22COLCody McLeod: Checking from behind5 min · PPG
  4. P1 5:22COLCody McLeod: Game misconduct10 min
  5. P1 17:46COLJan Hejda: Holding2 min
  6. P2 4:14MINDany Heatley: Holding2 min
  7. P2 6:11COLGabriel Landeskog: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P2 9:22MINNick Schultz: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P2 16:27MINDarroll Powe: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 1:52COLMatt Hunwick: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 6:13MINJarod Palmer: Interference2 min
  12. P3 10:33MINKyle Brodziak: Tripping2 min
  13. P3 15:33MINMatt Cullen: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
32Shots on goal22
2.8Expected goals2.2
53Shot attempts40
22Faceoffs won34
7Power plays6
23Penalty minutes14
12Hits15
9Blocked shots11
4Giveaways10
6Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestMcClement – Galiardi – Malone3:52

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Hejduk – O'Reilly – Landeskog5:25

    xG 0.01–0.12 (7%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

  3. Winnik – Stastny – Duchene6:22

    xG 0.00–0.44 (0%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunwick – Elliott7:35

    xG 0.30–0.11 (72%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. O'Byrne – Hejda9:59

    xG 0.30–0.46 (40%)attempts 9–12goals 2–0

  3. O'Brien – Johnson10:41

    xG 0.07–0.81 (8%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPeters – Johnson – Powe2:34

    xG 0.50–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Brodziak – Johnson – Powe4:30

    xG 0.41–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Heatley – Koivu – Clutterbuck8:24

    xG 0.23–0.05 (82%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  4. Peters – Staubitz – Gillies3:07

    xG 0.09–0.07 (58%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZidlicky – Falk5:43

    xG 0.54–0.11 (83%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Falk – Scandella3:57

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Lundin5:28

    xG 0.22–0.01 (96%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.2 xGCOL 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #312 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.96 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).