Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 2, 2012·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

San Jose Sharks 3, Vancouver Canucks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 57% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS0721709021335
VAN1907111020229

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:42VANJannik HansenAssists: Cody Hodgson · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:34SJSBenn FerrieroAssists: Ryane Clowe, Logan Couture · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:32SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Justin Braun, Joe Pavelski · Backhand, 0.22 xG2–1
  4. P3 11:35VANCody HodgsonPPAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. VAN Alexandre Burrows stopped
  2. 2. SJS Ryane Clowe stopped
  3. 3. VAN Cody Hodgson stopped
  4. 4. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  5. 5. VAN Ryan Kesler stopped
  6. 6. SJS Michal Handzus scored
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:57SJSDouglas Murray: Holding2 min
  2. P1 16:13SJSDouglas Murray: Interference2 min
  3. P1 17:24VANAlexandre Burrows: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 19:05SJSJason Demers: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 3:02VANAndrew Ebbett: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 19:48SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 19:48VANAlexandre Burrows: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 1:40SJSJason Demers: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 2:31SJSBrent Burns: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 6:05VANRoberto Luongo: Delaying game2 min
  11. P3 10:31SJSRyane Clowe: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSVAN
35Shots on goal29
2.5Expected goals2.1
56Shot attempts64
24Faceoffs won38
3Power plays6
14Penalty minutes8
17Hits17
24Blocked shots7
8Giveaways9
11Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestClowe – Ferriero – Couture6:59

    xG 0.42–0.07 (86%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  2. Thornton – Marleau – Pavelski9:39

    xG 0.48–0.19 (72%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. Thornton – Pavelski – Ferriero2:04

    xG 0.23–0.11 (68%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Winchester – Murray – Desjardins3:02

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Braun9:43

    xG 0.46–0.06 (89%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  2. Boyle – Vlasic14:52

    xG 0.55–0.25 (69%)attempts 14–15goals 1–0

  3. Murray – Burns2:10

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestHiggins – Kesler – Raymond7:41

    xG 0.25–0.06 (82%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  2. Hansen – Ebbett – Hodgson4:57

    xG 0.13–0.10 (56%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows10:36

    xG 0.26–0.29 (47%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  4. Higgins – Kesler – Hodgson2:27

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Edler10:37

    xG 0.26–0.09 (73%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Bieksa – Edler3:19

    xG 0.09–0.12 (44%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Alberts – Ballard7:56

    xG 0.01–0.17 (6%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.1 xGSJS 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #292 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 57% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).