Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 5, 2012·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Edmonton Oilers 3, St. Louis Blues 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

STL winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM0332108332
STL11409314437

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:42STLChris StewartAssists: Jamie Langenbrunner · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:12EDMTaylor HallPPAssists: Ales Hemsky, Ryan Jones · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:27EDMBen EagerAssists: Andy Sutton · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:54EDMJordan EberlePPAssists: Sam Gagner · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P3 0:20STLAlex PietrangeloPPAssists: Carlo Colaiacovo, David Backes · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:48STLDavid BackesPPAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Carlo Colaiacovo · Tip-in, 0.26 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:59STLMatt D'AgostiniGWGAssists: T.J. Oshie, Carlo Colaiacovo · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–4
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 4:17EDMAles Hemsky: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 12:32STLDavid Perron: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 16:39EDMAnton Lander: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 19:18STLT.J. Oshie: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 19:18EDMShawn Horcoff: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 2:01EDMBen Eager: Charging2 min
  7. P2 3:18STLKevin Shattenkirk: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 5:52EDMTheo Peckham: Holding2 min
  9. P2 8:48STLRoman Polak: Game misconduct10 min
  10. P2 8:48STLRoman Polak: Slashing5 min
  11. P2 13:33STLChris Stewart: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  12. P2 15:22STLDavid Perron: High sticking2 min
  13. P3 0:17EDMCorey Potter: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  14. P3 0:52EDMTaylor Hall: Roughing2 min · PPG
  15. P3 2:35STLJamie Langenbrunner: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 2:35EDMLadislav Smid: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
45% to win55% to win
← EDM attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Arnott won the faceoff against Belanger
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMSTL
32Shots on goal37
3.0Expected goals2.8
60Shot attempts58
33Faceoffs won32
5Power plays6
16Penalty minutes27
12Hits17
12Blocked shots15
5Giveaways4
11Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestGreen – Hartikainen – Lander5:05

    xG 0.28–0.10 (73%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. Hemsky – Gagner – Hall8:09

    xG 0.10–0.12 (45%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  3. Belanger – Eager – Jones8:07

    xG 0.12–0.37 (24%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  4. Smyth – Horcoff – Eberle8:06

    xG 0.10–0.89 (10%)attempts 3–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSutton – Petry10:19

    xG 0.72–0.36 (67%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  2. Smid – Peckham3:06

    xG 0.06–0.14 (30%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  3. Potter – Smid11:59

    xG 0.24–0.57 (30%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBackes – Stewart – Perron9:13

    xG 0.71–0.14 (83%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  2. Oshie – D'Agostini – Berglund7:28

    xG 0.57–0.04 (94%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  3. Nichol – Crombeen – Porter3:17

    xG 0.06–0.15 (29%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Arnott – Langenbrunner – Sobotka6:09

    xG 0.14–0.27 (35%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestColaiacovo – Pietrangelo13:30

    xG 0.86–0.16 (84%)attempts 17–13goals 0–0

  2. Polak – Fairchild3:16

    xG 0.38–0.03 (94%)attempts 4–1goals 0–1

  3. Jackman – Shattenkirk13:26

    xG 0.42–0.47 (47%)attempts 16–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.8 xGEDM 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #140 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.12 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

STL winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).