Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 7, 2012·TD Garden, Boston

Vancouver Canucks 4, Boston Bruins 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 70% of the time.

BOS winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN110216110436
BOS18112119339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:41VANRyan KeslerPPAssists: Sami Salo, Daniel Sedin · Snap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:57BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Tyler Seguin, Patrice Bergeron · Backhand, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:12BOSRich PeverleyAssists: Benoit Pouliot · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:21VANAlexandre BurrowsPPAssists: Cody Hodgson, Kevin Bieksa · Snap, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:47VANHenrik SedinPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Kevin Bieksa · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:09VANCody HodgsonPPGWGAssists: Dan Hamhuis · Slap, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P3 1:51BOSDavid KrejciAssists: Joe Corvo · Backhand, 0.25 xG4–3
Penalties (30)
  1. P1 0:17VANRyan Kesler: Interference2 min
  2. P1 3:54VANDale Weise: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 3:54VANAlexandre Burrows: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 3:54BOSMilan Lucic: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 3:54BOSShawn Thornton: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 3:54BOSShawn Thornton: Slashing2 min
  7. P1 3:54BOSMilan Lucic: Leaving players penalty bench10 min
  8. P1 3:54VANMaxim Lapierre: Misconduct10 min
  9. P1 3:54BOSNathan Horton: Fighting5 min
  10. P1 3:54VANAlexandre Burrows: Misconduct10 min
  11. P1 9:43VANDaniel Sedin: Hooking2 min
  12. P1 11:37VANRyan Kesler: Holding2 min
  13. P1 14:58BOSGregory Campbell: Fighting5 min
  14. P1 14:58VANMaxim Lapierre: Fighting5 min
  15. P1 14:58BOSShawn Thornton: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  16. P1 14:58VANDale Weise: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  17. P1 16:26BOSRich Peverley: Tripping2 min
  18. P1 18:45BOSBenoit Pouliot: High sticking2 min
  19. P2 2:55VANMason Raymond: High sticking2 min
  20. P2 2:55VANJannik Hansen: Roughing2 min
  21. P2 2:55BOSAdam McQuaid: Roughing2 min
  22. P2 8:08VANAlexandre Burrows: High sticking2 min
  23. P2 14:47BOSTyler Seguin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  24. P2 16:43BOSDavid Krejci: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  25. P2 18:47BOSBrad Marchand: Clipping5 min · PPG
  26. P2 18:47BOSBrad Marchand: Game misconduct10 min
  27. P3 1:31VANDaniel Sedin: Hooking2 min
  28. P3 6:38VANAlexander Edler: Holding2 min
  29. P3 13:22BOSNathan Horton: Tripping2 min
  30. P3 19:30VANDan Hamhuis: Delaying game2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANBOS
36Shots on goal39
2.1Expected goals3.1
53Shot attempts57
39Faceoffs won42
11Power plays7
52Penalty minutes55
24Hits17
10Blocked shots7
4Giveaways2
2Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMalhotra – Lapierre – Weise2:50

    xG 0.22–0.07 (77%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows5:20

    xG 0.28–0.14 (67%)attempts 8–2goals 0–1

  3. Hansen – Raymond – Hodgson2:00

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Higgins – Kesler – Raymond3:18

    xG 0.08–0.19 (30%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAlberts – Ballard4:45

    xG 0.24–0.10 (72%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Alberts – Edler2:21

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Ballard – Edler3:41

    xG 0.06–0.13 (30%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestKelly – Horton – Krejci2:14

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Bergeron – Pouliot – Seguin2:27

    xG 0.03–0.01 (82%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Horton – Krejci – Pouliot2:28

    xG 0.17–0.19 (46%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Campbell – Paille6:26

    xG 0.10–0.59 (14%)attempts 3–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCorvo – Seidenberg9:10

    xG 0.65–0.25 (73%)attempts 14–8goals 0–0

  2. Chara – Boychuk6:44

    xG 0.32–0.18 (63%)attempts 5–5goals 2–0

  3. Ference – Boychuk2:32

    xG 0.04–0.16 (19%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.1 xGVAN 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #147 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 70% of the time.

BOS winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).