Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 7, 2012·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Ottawa Senators 2, Philadelphia Flyers 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 65% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
OTT0911411103237
PHI1130911314339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:05PHIDaniel BrièreAssists: Jakub Voracek, Andrej Meszaros · Wrist, 0.39 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:05OTTMilan MichalekPPAssists: Sergei Gonchar, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.68 xG1–1
  3. P3 6:43OTTBobby ButlerAssists: Erik Karlsson, Filip Kuba · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P3 9:12PHIDaniel BrièrePPAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Wayne Simmonds · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. OT 4:54PHIDaniel BrièreGWGAssists: Jakub Voracek · Backhand, 0.32 xG2–3
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 2:30OTTNick Foligno: Holding2 min
  2. P1 12:19PHIKimmo Timonen: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 2:54OTTMatt Carkner: Interference2 min
  4. P2 9:25PHIBraydon Coburn: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:58PHIMatt Carle: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 16:16OTTKyle Turris: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 16:16PHIDaniel Brière: Interference2 min
  8. P2 18:36PHIDaniel Brière: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 18:36OTTKyle Turris: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 19:05OTTSergei Gonchar: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 1:56OTTBobby Butler: Too many men on the ice2 min
  12. P3 4:10OTTBobby Butler: Too many men on the ice2 min
  13. P3 8:04OTTKyle Turris: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  14. P3 8:04PHIMax Talbot: Slashing2 min
  15. P3 8:04OTTNick Foligno: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
45% to win55% to win
← OTT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Spezza
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTPHI
37Shots on goal39
4.3Expected goals3.3
68Shot attempts69
29Faceoffs won36
3Power plays6
21Penalty minutes15
20Hits28
14Blocked shots17
5Giveaways11
8Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestAlfredsson – Condra – Turris9:37

    xG 0.59–0.14 (80%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  2. Spezza – Michalek – Greening9:40

    xG 0.30–0.35 (46%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Konopka – Daugavins – Butler3:09

    xG 0.17–0.32 (34%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  4. Neil – Foligno – Smith6:15

    xG 0.16–0.50 (25%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKuba – Karlsson14:58

    xG 1.43–0.50 (74%)attempts 21–16goals 1–0

  2. Phillips – Carkner7:50

    xG 0.36–0.21 (63%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

  3. Gonchar – Cowen12:31

    xG 0.38–0.91 (30%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestRinaldo – Zolnierczyk – Couturier5:23

    xG 0.42–0.02 (96%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Brière – Talbot – Voracek7:05

    xG 0.71–0.56 (56%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. Brière – Hartnell – Giroux2:05

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. van Riemsdyk – Simmonds – Schenn8:16

    xG 0.17–0.53 (24%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLilja – Meszaros6:58

    xG 0.81–0.46 (64%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Carle – Bourdon7:55

    xG 0.35–0.28 (55%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Coburn – Carle4:11

    xG 0.06–0.28 (18%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.3 xGOTT 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #235 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.10 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 65% of the time.

PHI winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).