Sat, Jan 7, 2012·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh
New Jersey Devils 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 58% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJD | 03 | 217 | 17 | 327 |
| PIT | 112 | 017 | 013 | 142 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 4:48PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Paul Martin, Chris Kunitz · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
- P2 8:39NJDAdam HenriqueSHAssists: Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–1
- P2 11:23NJDIlya KovalchukGWGAssists: Zach Parise, Adam Henrique · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
- P3 1:28NJDDainius ZubrusPPAssists: Patrik Elias, Ilya Kovalchuk · Tip-in, 0.15 xG3–1
Penalties (5)
- P2 7:53NJDEric Boulton: Interference goalkeeper2 min
- P3 0:17PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 12:20NJDHenrik Tallinder: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
- P3 13:40NJDBryce Salvador: Slashing2 min
- P3 13:40PITChris Kunitz: High sticking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Elias
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
New Jersey Devils
Forward lines
- bestClarkson – Zalewski – Tedenby8:59
xG 0.52–0.11 (82%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0
- Kovalchuk – Parise – Henrique13:56
xG 0.65–0.48 (57%)attempts 13–12goals 1–1
- Boulton – Carter – Palmieri5:45
xG 0.16–0.33 (32%)attempts 2–12goals 0–0
- Sykora – Elias – Zubrus15:09
xG 0.11–0.59 (15%)attempts 6–18goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFoster – Taormina11:15
xG 0.64–0.17 (80%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0
- Salvador – Larsson17:52
xG 0.81–0.34 (70%)attempts 18–14goals 0–0
- Taormina – Larsson3:05
xG 0.02–0.21 (8%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forward lines
- bestKunitz – Malkin – Neal17:04
xG 0.74–0.18 (80%)attempts 21–7goals 1–0
- Park – Sullivan – Kennedy5:29
xG 0.18–0.08 (70%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- Cooke – Dupuis – Kennedy2:40
xG 0.01–0.07 (16%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Adams – Cooke – Dupuis8:09
xG 0.12–0.24 (34%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestNiskanen – Lovejoy10:59
xG 0.40–0.10 (79%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0
- Orpik – Engelland16:00
xG 0.69–0.59 (54%)attempts 21–13goals 0–0
- Martin – Niskanen2:18
xG 0.13–0.08 (62%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 58% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PIT − NJD), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).