Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 10, 2012·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

San Jose Sharks 4, Minnesota Wild 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS1807318050438
MIN11011128022531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:04MINCal ClutterbuckAssists: Casey Wellman, Marek Zidlicky · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:08SJSDan BoylePPAssists: Patrick Marleau, Joe Thornton · Slap, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:26MINWarren PetersAssists: Justin Falk, David McIntyre · Deflected, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 7:42MINNick JohnsonAssists: Dany Heatley, Justin Falk · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 9:47SJSBenn FerrieroAssists: Marc-Edouard Vlasic, Dan Boyle · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P3 13:40MINMatt CullenAssists: Casey Wellman, Cal Clutterbuck · Wrist, 0.47 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:54SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Brent Burns, Dan Boyle · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:16SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Joe Thornton, Joe Pavelski · Tip-in, 0.11 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Matt Cullen scored
  2. 2. SJS Michal Handzus stopped
  3. 3. MIN Mikko Koivu scored
  4. 4. SJS Ryane Clowe stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 11:05SJSJamie McGinn: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 15:20MINJared Spurgeon: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:24MINKyle Brodziak: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 10:08SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 13:39MINCal Clutterbuck: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 13:39SJSJamie McGinn: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 18:10SJSAndrew Desjardins: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 2:33MINDavid McIntyre: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cullen won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSMIN
38Shots on goal31
2.7Expected goals3.0
73Shot attempts63
35Faceoffs won35
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
13Hits20
11Blocked shots17
2Giveaways10
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Marleau – Pavelski13:08

    xG 0.54–0.17 (76%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  2. Winchester – Desjardins – Wingels4:34

    xG 0.04–0.08 (34%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Clowe – Ferriero – Couture5:49

    xG 0.12–0.17 (40%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Mitchell – McGinn – Ferriero2:27

    xG 0.07–0.13 (36%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoyle – Burns3:04

    xG 0.35–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 2–0

  2. Boyle – Vlasic14:36

    xG 0.67–0.37 (64%)attempts 14–15goals 1–0

  3. Murray – Burns6:21

    xG 0.15–0.05 (76%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Clutterbuck – Wellman10:30

    xG 1.09–0.68 (62%)attempts 14–17goals 2–0

  2. Brodziak – McIntyre – Powe9:14

    xG 0.20–0.19 (51%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  3. Heatley – Koivu – Johnson15:04

    xG 0.28–0.29 (49%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

  4. Peters – Staubitz – Gillies4:16

    xG 0.07–0.13 (37%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Stoner16:45

    xG 1.10–0.27 (81%)attempts 20–10goals 1–1

  2. Falk – Spurgeon14:44

    xG 0.58–0.60 (49%)attempts 16–16goals 3–1

  3. Schultz – Zidlicky13:13

    xG 0.26–0.59 (31%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.0 xGSJS 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #67 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.27 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).