Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 20, 2012·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Montréal Canadiens 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MTL2621207040429
PIT110112214021538

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:34MTLLars EllerAssists: P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:02PITKris LetangAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Dustin Jeffrey · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 5:41MTLErik ColeAssists: Andrei Kostitsyn, Tomas Kaberle · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:09MTLAndrei KostitsynPPAssists: Tomas Kaberle, David Desharnais · Snap, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P2 5:32PITDustin JeffreySHAssists: Zbynek Michalek · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P2 10:34MTLMax PaciorettyAssists: Erik Cole, Peter Budaj · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P3 3:32PITDustin JeffreyAssists: Tyler Kennedy · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–3
  8. P3 17:17PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: James Neal, Kris Letang · Slap, 0.03 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. PIT Kris Letang stopped
  2. 2. MTL David Desharnais stopped
  3. 3. PIT Evgeni Malkin scored
  4. 4. MTL Andrei Kostitsyn stopped
  5. 5. PIT James Neal stopped
  6. 6. MTL Scott Gomez stopped
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 2:57MTLMax Pacioretty: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:57PITChris Kunitz: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 2:57MTLMax Pacioretty: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 3:16PITSteve Sullivan: Interference2 min
  5. P1 6:22PITJames Neal: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 11:37MTLP.K. Subban: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 19:16PITBrooks Orpik: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 5:14PITCraig Adams: Holding2 min
  9. P2 19:45PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 0:00PITCraig Adams: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 6:55MTLErik Cole: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 12:42MTLErik Cole: Interference2 min
  13. P3 13:25PITChris Kunitz: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
45% to win55% to win
← MTL attackPIT attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLPIT
29Shots on goal38
2.8Expected goals3.3
57Shot attempts76
27Faceoffs won37
6Power plays4
13Penalty minutes27
20Hits26
22Blocked shots13
4Giveaways4
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestCole – Kostitsyn – Desharnais2:52

    xG 0.48–0.06 (89%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Moen – Plekanec – Bourque10:26

    xG 0.41–0.21 (66%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Desharnais – Pacioretty8:11

    xG 0.40–0.20 (66%)attempts 9–9goals 1–1

  4. Kostitsyn – Blunden – Eller5:32

    xG 0.11–0.39 (21%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKaberle – Emelin10:13

    xG 0.59–0.36 (62%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  2. Gill – Gorges14:33

    xG 0.73–0.71 (51%)attempts 15–19goals 0–1

  3. Campoli – Subban11:22

    xG 0.26–0.45 (36%)attempts 11–8goals 2–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kennedy – Jeffrey4:47

    xG 0.28–0.06 (82%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Dupuis – Malkin – Neal2:16

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Park – Cooke – Dupuis2:03

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  4. Park – Sullivan – Cooke3:20

    xG 0.15–0.55 (21%)attempts 3–10goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Niskanen8:27

    xG 0.58–0.36 (62%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  2. Martin – Letang2:47

    xG 0.25–0.07 (77%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Orpik – Letang13:46

    xG 0.49–0.45 (52%)attempts 16–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.3 xGMTL 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #32 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.68 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).