Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 21, 2012·Prudential Center, Newark

Philadelphia Flyers 4, New Jersey Devils 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 61% of the time.

NJD winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI042927420
NJD0911507131

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 9:30PHIMatt ReadAssists: Wayne Simmonds · Snap, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 13:04PHIScott HartnellPPGWGAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:32NJDAlexei PonikarovskyAssists: Matt Taormina, David Clarkson · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P3 8:07PHIScott HartnellPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 17:38PHIWayne SimmondsENUnassisted · Backhand, 0.67 xG4–1
Penalties (19)
  1. P1 5:15NJDEric Boulton: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 5:15PHIJody Shelley: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:24PHIZac Rinaldo: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 11:59NJDDavid Clarkson: Interference2 min
  5. P1 14:18PHIDaniel Brière: Elbowing2 min
  6. P2 10:42PHIBraydon Coburn: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 12:54NJDAdam Larsson: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P2 16:12PHIWayne Simmonds: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 16:12NJDDavid Clarkson: Misconduct10 min
  10. P2 19:18NJDBrad Mills: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 0:00NJDDainius Zubrus: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 0:00PHIScott Hartnell: Boarding2 min
  13. P2 0:00PHIScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 7:20NJDIlya Kovalchuk: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  15. P3 13:19PHIKimmo Timonen: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  16. P3 18:14NJDBrad Mills: High sticking2 min
  17. P3 18:14NJDEric Boulton: Misconduct10 min
  18. P3 18:14NJDBrad Mills: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 18:14PHIMarc-Andre Bourdon: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
45% to win55% to win
← PHI attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Elias won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHINJD
20Shots on goal31
2.5Expected goals2.0
32Shot attempts47
29Faceoffs won29
5Power plays6
29Penalty minutes47
19Hits24
9Blocked shots4
2Giveaways4
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Giroux – Schenn4:07

    xG 0.13–0.03 (83%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Brière – Talbot – Voracek8:38

    xG 0.51–0.43 (54%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Jagr – Hartnell – Giroux2:48

    xG 0.01–0.02 (42%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Simmonds – Read – Couturier9:14

    xG 0.16–0.17 (49%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCoburn – Carle3:38

    xG 0.22–0.01 (97%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Carle – Meszaros3:12

    xG 0.16–0.06 (72%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Meszaros – Gustafsson8:40

    xG 0.22–0.27 (44%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestKovalchuk – Parise – Henrique9:21

    xG 0.31–0.10 (76%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Sykora – Elias – Zubrus9:57

    xG 0.33–0.14 (71%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Boulton – Carter – Mills3:52

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Ponikarovsky – Clarkson – Josefson7:08

    xG 0.25–0.27 (49%)attempts 7–2goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTaormina – Larsson17:38

    xG 0.47–0.14 (78%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  2. Volchenkov – Foster9:43

    xG 0.41–0.45 (48%)attempts 11–4goals 0–1

  3. Salvador – Fayne12:06

    xG 0.18–0.26 (41%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.0 xGPHI 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 36/100 · #749 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.21 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 61% of the time.

NJD winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).