Mon, Jan 23, 2012·RBC Center, Raleigh
Winnipeg Jets 1, Carolina Hurricanes 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 80% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPG | 06 | 110 | 014 | 130 |
| CAR | 27 | 07 | 02 | 216 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 3:55CARJeff SkinnerAssists: Tim Gleason · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
- P1 9:28CARTim BrentGWGAssists: Anthony Stewart · Backhand, 0.05 xG0–2
- P2 13:47WPGKyle WellwoodAssists: Toby Enstrom, Nik Antropov · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–2
Penalties (5)
- P1 0:51CARTuomo Ruutu: Boarding2 min
- P2 6:36CARJussi Jokinen: Tripping2 min
- P2 16:14WPGJohnny Oduya: Interference2 min
- P3 10:35WPGJim Slater: Holding2 min
- P3 0:00CARJiri Tlusty: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Sutter won the faceoff against Antropov
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Winnipeg Jets
Forward lines
- bestAntropov – Wellwood – Ladd12:10
xG 0.90–0.40 (69%)attempts 13–5goals 1–1
- Wheeler – Little – Burmistrov11:25
xG 0.51–0.08 (86%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0
- Thorburn – Slater – Glass7:33
xG 0.47–0.11 (82%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0
- Miettinen – Fehr – Cormier3:49
xG 0.11–0.13 (47%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHainsey – Enstrom15:23
xG 0.85–0.18 (82%)attempts 22–3goals 1–0
- Enstrom – Bogosian3:23
xG 0.25–0.03 (88%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Oduya – Bogosian16:02
xG 0.48–0.37 (57%)attempts 18–13goals 0–0
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- bestLaRose – Brent – Stewart2:14
xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0
- Jokinen – Brent – Skinner2:43
xG 0.13–0.12 (53%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Dwyer – Nodl – Sutter11:57
xG 0.27–0.47 (36%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0
- Ruutu – Staal – Tlusty10:59
xG 0.10–0.44 (19%)attempts 3–17goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Joslin – McBain11:53
xG 0.34–0.43 (44%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0
- Harrison – Faulk19:22
xG 0.42–0.71 (37%)attempts 10–21goals 1–0
- Allen – Gleason15:09
xG 0.29–0.99 (23%)attempts 7–17goals 1–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 80% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CAR − WPG), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).