Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 24, 2012·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 3, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN21309112334
COL1417015226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:37COLTJ GaliardiAssists: Milan Hejduk, Gabriel Landeskog · Backhand, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:40MINJustin FalkPPAssists: Devin Setoguchi, Matt Cullen · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:15MINDany HeatleyAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Greg Zanon · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:46COLChuck KobasewAssists: Daniel Winnik, Jay McClement · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:44MINCarson McMillanGWGAssists: Kyle Brodziak · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 6:19COLGabriel Landeskog: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 6:38MINDevin Setoguchi: Interference2 min
  3. P1 9:20COLKyle Quincey: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:45COLKyle Quincey: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 19:45MINDarroll Powe: Charging2 min
  6. P2 6:58MINJustin Falk: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 6:58COLDaniel Winnik: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 6:58COLDaniel Winnik: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 18:44COLShane O'Brien: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 5:08MINCarson McMillan: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Brodziak won the faceoff against Stastny
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
34Shots on goal26
2.9Expected goals1.2
69Shot attempts54
31Faceoffs won32
4Power plays2
11Penalty minutes15
27Hits26
20Blocked shots22
2Giveaways7
11Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHeatley – Brodziak – Johnson11:31

    xG 0.80–0.18 (82%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  2. Peters – Powe – McMillan9:34

    xG 0.26–0.02 (92%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Ortmeyer – Kassian – Rau4:05

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Cullen – Setoguchi – Clutterbuck9:57

    xG 0.24–0.26 (48%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Stoner15:34

    xG 1.35–0.26 (84%)attempts 24–14goals 1–0

  2. Falk – Prosser15:13

    xG 0.79–0.34 (70%)attempts 15–13goals 0–1

  3. Schultz – Spurgeon12:54

    xG 0.17–0.12 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Jones – Stastny – Mueller5:54

    xG 0.07–0.13 (35%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  2. Hejduk – Stastny – Landeskog4:28

    xG 0.05–0.17 (21%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. McLeod – Stastny – Mueller2:09

    xG 0.04–0.24 (13%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Kobasew – McClement – Winnik6:23

    xG 0.41–0.79 (34%)attempts 6–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Johnson4:29

    xG 0.15–0.09 (62%)attempts 3–5goals 1–0

  2. Hejda – Quincey2:00

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Quincey – Wilson2:23

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.2 xGMIN 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #583 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.61 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).