Wed, Feb 1, 2012·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles
Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Los Angeles Kings 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 69% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBJ | 09 | 18 | 15 | 222 |
| LAK | 113 | 111 | 19 | 333 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:40LAKJustin WilliamsPPAssists: Drew Doughty · Snap, 0.04 xG0–1
- P2 1:09CBJDerek DorsettAssists: Derick Brassard, Vinny Prospal · Wrist, 0.34 xG1–1
- P2 14:32LAKDustin PennerUnassisted · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
- P3 4:52CBJColton GilliesAssists: Antoine Vermette, John Moore · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–2
- P3 19:59LAKDrew DoughtyPPGWGAssists: Jack Johnson, Anze Kopitar · Slap, 0.41 xG2–3
Penalties (6)
- P1 1:54LAKWillie Mitchell: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
- P1 7:36CBJFedor Tyutin: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P1 15:58CBJDerick Brassard: High sticking2 min
- P1 18:12LAKSlava Voynov: Tripping2 min
- P3 10:58LAKJustin Williams: Interference2 min
- P3 18:54CBJSamuel Pahlsson: Holding2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Richards won the faceoff against Brassard
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- bestUmberger – Nash – Brassard11:24
xG 0.81–0.33 (71%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1
- MacKenzie – Joudrey – Boll7:53
xG 0.15–0.09 (62%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0
- Vermette – Russell – Gillies9:47
xG 0.30–0.29 (51%)attempts 4–11goals 1–0
- Prospal – Pahlsson – Dorsett10:05
xG 0.08–1.00 (8%)attempts 5–17goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJohnson – Moore15:45
xG 0.88–0.57 (61%)attempts 7–22goals 2–1
- Tyutin – Lebda19:07
xG 0.66–0.57 (54%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0
- Clitsome – Savard10:59
xG 0.34–1.18 (22%)attempts 9–16goals 0–0
Los Angeles Kings
Forward lines
- bestRichardson – Lewis – Loktionov8:47
xG 0.88–0.45 (66%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1
- Williams – Brown – Kopitar15:00
xG 0.53–0.11 (82%)attempts 17–5goals 0–0
- Fraser – Westgarth – Clifford8:09
xG 0.08–0.15 (35%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0
- Stoll – Richards – Penner10:42
xG 0.46–1.14 (29%)attempts 9–11goals 1–1
Defence pairs
- bestMitchell – Voynov14:53
xG 0.88–0.30 (75%)attempts 19–5goals 0–0
- Mitchell – Greene2:12
xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0
- Greene – Johnson13:41
xG 0.42–0.25 (63%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 69% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (LAK − CBJ), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).